From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347B4385E83A; Tue, 14 May 2024 10:44:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 347B4385E83A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 347B4385E83A Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=63.228.1.57 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715683475; cv=none; b=WmX8G3j6vj+CGSWiVc5SX/HK6z8PQMLW8WsCn4bsZJ8L360B+APHsIxqfkxsuiiZifDjleS8J/vjRQFQNC+BA0qqtN4VolB6oUKPxrrRVQubR3Olt5dMXS5TZfUmtTsIXFQzlOchT5aF/fjGbPlSVUd9nij2b2aNdULdAvvYxp4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715683475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fkJWhudBDQoURgbFxJYn8PkBK616JnA1Dxdrs4m7YUE=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=F4gGCLRCSck7Wv0WhgfHOzEtJtNarSCYw+l4RNYFCvUkyphyfAbgrmROcFIENhz2p8k2JdSvG4tHGH/M43tr/3dJ/38vlO5lKUYvgHMOysaBadSImtytHvAga/iqYwped+OihCjONTF7Jdfw56VI+gLKM0+xrJtyxTQ4dbk+/go= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from gate.crashing.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id 44EAhXUr025371; Tue, 14 May 2024 05:43:33 -0500 Received: (from segher@localhost) by gate.crashing.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id 44EAhX2C025370; Tue, 14 May 2024 05:43:33 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: gate.crashing.org: segher set sender to segher@kernel.crashing.org using -f Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 05:43:33 -0500 From: Segher Boessenkool To: Jiufu Guo Cc: "Kewen.Lin" , dje.gcc@gmail.com, linkw@gcc.gnu.org, bergner@linux.ibm.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] report message for operator %a on unaddressible exp Message-ID: <20240514104333.GG19790@gate.crashing.org> References: <20240513025712.889169-1-guojiufu@linux.ibm.com> <20240514092054.GF19790@gate.crashing.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:53:56PM +0800, Jiufu Guo wrote: > Thanks so much for your great review! > Reference other messages, I'm wondering "invalid %%a value" may be > acceptable, or "invalid %%a address expression in TOC" maybe better. "%%a requires a memory operand"? Maybe even print out the actual operand given, too. Segher