public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Haochen Jiang <haochen.jiang@intel.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: hongtao.liu@intel.com, ubizjak@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Adjust generic loop alignment from 16:11:8 to 16 for Intel processors
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 11:04:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240515030429.2575440-2-haochen.jiang@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240515030429.2575440-1-haochen.jiang@intel.com>

Previously, we use 16:11:8 in generic tune for Intel processors, which
lead to cross cache line issue and result in some random performance
penalty in benchmarks with small loops commit to commit.

After changing to always aligning to 16 bytes, it will somehow solve
the issue.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h (generic_cost): Change from
	16:11:8 to 16.
---
 gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h
index 65d7d1f7e42..d3aaaa4b5cc 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/x86-tune-costs.h
@@ -3758,7 +3758,7 @@ struct processor_costs generic_cost = {
   generic_memset,
   COSTS_N_INSNS (4),			/* cond_taken_branch_cost.  */
   COSTS_N_INSNS (2),			/* cond_not_taken_branch_cost.  */
-  "16:11:8",				/* Loop alignment.  */
+  "16",					/* Loop alignment.  */
   "16:11:8",				/* Jump alignment.  */
   "0:0:8",				/* Label alignment.  */
   "16",					/* Func alignment.  */
-- 
2.31.1


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-15  3:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-15  3:04 [PATCH 0/2] Align tight loops to solve cross cacheline issue Haochen Jiang
2024-05-15  3:04 ` Haochen Jiang [this message]
2024-05-15  3:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] Align tight&hot loop without considering max skipping bytes Haochen Jiang
2024-05-15  3:30 ` [PATCH 0/2] Align tight loops to solve cross cacheline issue Jiang, Haochen
2024-05-20  3:15   ` Hongtao Liu
2024-05-27  1:33     ` Hongtao Liu
2024-05-29  3:30       ` Jiang, Haochen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240515030429.2575440-2-haochen.jiang@intel.com \
    --to=haochen.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).