From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [116.202.254.214]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09346388204E for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 19:45:24 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 09346388204E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=gmx.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=m.gmane-mx.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 09346388204E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=116.202.254.214 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718653526; cv=none; b=dFaK3+U/KV901Ik3cqtIt5j9/T6G2ie2ltSFm00O8LtjsjXqN98N0nZKvfpzn2anPRzNv869ZBzLju5ss5nzcTeEdIdb0kCKsNfRnM7BBhpFYg58sqB0Xw8A3R9WGB1xq2Xufc8y7fwP3Vbjb4yoN5GTqa9s1Hc4Qqkx8Jsnb38= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1718653526; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HbzwG3+qLv92RRXgRPEMHuh7lxV/+IfFTRTvUJ19Pzo=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Mime-Version; b=OsGf0nCI5u3i1LeHjNDWt0ur9w0PDj9E4Ovr5TZR404ubv/GZj4OVO4oRwc4E3kgrZO1fOU0PJDZxveERaKWdHajo5Qx1RfRthWiNfIxNIpwby6H8Fgh1t5HX4Jx1rg3oQrTja03sHCmXTv3GAdm1qiXudi1Vh6luauQWHcp1i0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sJII7-0001gz-0G for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:45:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Harald Anlauf Subject: Re: [Patch, Fortran, 96418] Fix Test coarray_alloc_comp_4.f08 ICEs Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:45:15 +0200 Message-ID: <7fb96a01-e0cf-425f-bb5f-351df122aa3b@gmx.de> References: <20240611161238.14634f57@vepi2> <20240614092256.48442c03@vepi2> <20240617095117.096bd158@vepi2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <20240617095117.096bd158@vepi2> Cc: fortran@gcc.gnu.org X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Message-ID: <20240617194515.Fqh_9Yy_oTtZp0z2GYdPVTQ1IXZvVZ2hK-SgGb9V2Og@z> Hi Andre, Am 17.06.24 um 09:51 schrieb Andre Vehreschild: > Regarding your question on the coarray-tests that are not in the > coarray-directory: These test in most cases test only one method of > implementing coarrays. I.e., they are either testing just -fcoarray=single or > -fcoarray=lib -lcaf_single, which are two different approaches. The tests in > the coarray-directory test all available methods to implement coarrays. Pushing ah, that explains it. I only looked at some of the test sources, but did not think of looking at caf.exp ... > all coarray-tests into the coarray-directory will fail a lot of them, because > the behavior of -fcoarray=single and -fcoarray=lib -lcaf_single is different in > some corner cases. That's why the coarray-tests in the main gfortran-dir are > separate. > > I do understand why it may be confusing, but I don't see an easy solution. Does > this answer your question? Indeed it does! Thanks, Harald