[PATCH] Fortran: fix doumentation of intrinsic RANDOM_INIT [PR114146]

[PATCH] Fortran: fix doumentation of intrinsic RANDOM_INIT [PR114146]

[Harald Anlauf]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 210 bytes --]

Dear all,

here's a documentation bugfix.  The previous wording was in conflict
with the standard, while the runtime behavior is apparently fine.

Checked with make dvi pdf .

OK for mainline?

Thanks,
Harald


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: pr114146.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1959 bytes --]

From 4515018fd858fb6ae98b54d507596ef123d7580e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2024 22:31:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Fortran: fix doumentation of intrinsic RANDOM_INIT [PR114146]

gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:

	* intrinsic.texi: Fix documentation of arguments of RANDOM_INIT,
	which is conforming to the F2018 standard.
---
 gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi
index 3d3b9edf8e6..10683e1185d 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi
+++ b/gcc/fortran/intrinsic.texi
@@ -11928,15 +11928,15 @@ Subroutine
 and it is @code{INTENT(IN)}.  If it is @code{.true.}, the seed is set to
 a processor-dependent value that is the same each time @code{RANDOM_INIT}
 is called from the same image.  The term ``same image'' means a single
-instance of program execution.  The sequence of random numbers is different
-for repeated execution of the program.  If it is @code{.false.}, the seed
-is set to a processor-dependent value.
+instance of program execution.  The sequence of random numbers is the same
+for repeated execution of the program with the same execution environment.
+If it is @code{.false.}, the seed is set to a processor-dependent value.
 @item @var{IMAGE_DISTINCT} @tab Shall be a scalar with a
 @code{LOGICAL} type, and it is @code{INTENT(IN)}.  If it is @code{.true.},
-the seed is set to a processor-dependent value that is distinct from th
+the seed is set to a processor-dependent value that is distinct from the
 seed set by a call to @code{RANDOM_INIT} in another image.  If it is
-@code{.false.}, the seed is set to a value that does depend which image called
-@code{RANDOM_INIT}.
+@code{.false.}, the seed is set to a value that is the same on every image
+calling @code{RANDOM_INIT}.
 @end multitable

 @item @emph{Example}:
--
2.35.3

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix doumentation of intrinsic RANDOM_INIT [PR114146]

[Andre Vehreschild]

Hi Harald,

s/doumentation/documentation/

in the commit's title.

Thanks for the patch, ok to commit.

- Andre

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 22:37:53 +0200
Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> here's a documentation bugfix.  The previous wording was in conflict
> with the standard, while the runtime behavior is apparently fine.
>
> Checked with make dvi pdf .
>
> OK for mainline?
>
> Thanks,
> Harald
>


--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix doumentation of intrinsic RANDOM_INIT [PR114146]

[Harald Anlauf]

Hi Andre,

Am 16.08.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
> Hi Harald,
>
> s/doumentation/documentation/
>
> in the commit's title.

oops!  Thanks for pointing this out.

Fixed and pushed as r15-2955-g07ece73d4712c6 .

Harald

> Thanks for the patch, ok to commit.
>
> - Andre
>
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 22:37:53 +0200
> Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> here's a documentation bugfix.  The previous wording was in conflict
>> with the standard, while the runtime behavior is apparently fine.
>>
>> Checked with make dvi pdf .
>>
>> OK for mainline?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harald
>>
>
>
> --
> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
>

Re: [PATCH] Fortran: fix doumentation of intrinsic RANDOM_INIT [PR114146]

[Harald Anlauf]

Hi Andre,

Am 16.08.24 um 07:46 schrieb Andre Vehreschild:
> Hi Harald,
> 
> s/doumentation/documentation/
> 
> in the commit's title.

oops!  Thanks for pointing this out.

Fixed and pushed as r15-2955-g07ece73d4712c6 .

Harald

> Thanks for the patch, ok to commit.
> 
> - Andre
> 
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 22:37:53 +0200
> Harald Anlauf <anlauf@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
>> Dear all,
>>
>> here's a documentation bugfix.  The previous wording was in conflict
>> with the standard, while the runtime behavior is apparently fine.
>>
>> Checked with make dvi pdf .
>>
>> OK for mainline?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Harald
>>
> 
> 
> --
> Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
>