Re: [C++ Patch] Fix PR 35112

[Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@integrable-solutions.net>]

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini@oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi again,
>> Don't pretend I'm that difficult :-)
>>
>> Seriously, here is what I meant:  in the current print_candidates
>> the inner for loop i(the one that goes over functions in an
>> overload set) s repeated twice.  So, you can make
>> that a function of its own, say print_overloaded_functions.
>> Then print_candidates calls print_overloaded_functions in
>> the is_overloaded_fn branch, but loops over the list
>> of overload set in the else branch, calling print_overloaded_functions
>> with the TREE_VALUE.  Does that make sense to you?
>>
> Sure. The below is what I have tested on x86_64-linux. Is it ok?

OK!  Thanks.

Just for my curiosity, was the test for TREE_LIST in print_overloaded_functions
necessary?  For which case?

-- Gaby