From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4794 invoked by alias); 26 Feb 2010 09:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 4782 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Feb 2010 09:43:27 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-qy0-f197.google.com (HELO mail-qy0-f197.google.com) (209.85.221.197) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:43:23 +0000 Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so1665976qyk.18 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:43:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.221.130 with SMTP id ic2mr55050qcb.73.1267177401630; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 01:43:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100226093904.GT2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> References: <4B84A60B.5020709@oracle.com> <206fcf961002252308t3883270bpb5d7cd0fd02bf2d@mail.gmail.com> <206fcf961002252331k7f390be1jc96a7025bc34d410@mail.gmail.com> <4B8793BA.8050201@gnu.org> <206fcf961002260132q4aa22a7ep2ff42d145442a971@mail.gmail.com> <20100226093904.GT2817@tyan-ft48-01.lab.bos.redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:04:00 -0000 Message-ID: <206fcf961002260143v334a4206gc045d9a7b8eb3887@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: gcc/cp/pt.c: use ngettext() when needed From: Gabriel Dos Reis To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Marco Poletti , Shujing Zhao , "Joseph S. Myers" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Paolo Carlini Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg01126.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 3:39 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 03:32:27AM -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: >> > No, that (as I already said upthread) will not work for Baltic and Sla= vic >> > languages. =C2=A0A Czech example: >> > >> > =C2=A0 1 kandid=C3=A1t >> > =C2=A0 2-3-4 kandid=C3=A1ti >> > =C2=A0 5+ kandid=C3=A1t=C5=AF >> > >> > Paolo >> > >> >> yes, but if you want me to review a new version of your patch >> based on feedbacks, don't hesitate to be more specific about >> what "this" refers to. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00719.html > with > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-02/msg00961.html > changes for exgettext instead of the original one. > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Jakub > The patch is OK. Thanks. -- Gaby