From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x635.google.com (mail-ej1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::635]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 511AB3858C53 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 12:18:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 511AB3858C53 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-x635.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-99c3c8adb27so870990066b.1 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 05:18:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692879521; x=1693484321; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kRTtQPfC5zqPJyaHXvoin0aM9gOMpd3DIZdfQW48uas=; b=DclhR8//STlETMoCgLpNblNcRdo4VcOIrv75egzQ+5Ex3Lkt2QmEPMSVeFXVeHlXak BflKn0zmfEmg5g/DpycUvWoq7zkNraSb3T17lULFR6e3YDn8SEhvlhKBKVceO9Yu0n/e KNPye1bRATcyZ5AHhgnOHB5S66dtM+F4SofjfZHCuvqkPj+JGtXq+tW9T8/ZF4Dy3k9g SUVxsFicgG7/466Hik2ROlFVfurUtV6tT88YeWWTwjakDKfC7238lBUnS2AQvTDeIAfn Dv+RO5osHYDomnzBeJenqk+0Mg5oyYClio0+CEqsbqCRe/9UvsS7FNgwqGV0Hs4RMraW sX6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692879521; x=1693484321; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=kRTtQPfC5zqPJyaHXvoin0aM9gOMpd3DIZdfQW48uas=; b=WVXN1GruE/AaalK5QtXK70dMeuDXTVDH8oOj+6vUyIcDV1ieyG8Ym/YamDePhOiHZy pIRd4qRrOlUNqFXi1qmV5mCnSPrPhLPKQKXVEk/XtO1XQEdBFl8XfTEUj/VJyVhHCiuZ o1fV7Hrsv7AfUvxIR8gX9JQsI6Qi0iZ6BGrcw5DEF2xcf5zHc3uOWUMQratYVih7XAEP obx+77gwTem+H60y2VEY8+KorMma2ritRc3Nqjaaggm28oDXw01219tnBEjmrcvRcvrC Gubdu8zfnJXr5TtVQXwlpm0mHDc60ifoNj5Q91c8zJp4Q6tkpVLMXwZYmWqwukHg/wRd RZ0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxjEWpsIyPIer7qvFPUppjq17oeVowg+pHNd0ml0U3pEB9Gm0Uk 5+bo/c5GeOQx/ahyiELRYHq55NgJ3D0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFJmU6HgYUliDvs9peHiH/8vCDsKotUpUlfYDVV2r9l+/mUqWGOPVDdLupVnK4Mv6gniuuxlQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:209e:b0:99b:627b:e96d with SMTP id 30-20020a170906209e00b0099b627be96dmr13267267ejq.44.1692879520835; Thu, 24 Aug 2023 05:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.23] (ip-046-005-130-086.um12.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [46.5.130.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k26-20020a1709062a5a00b00997cce73cc7sm10964582eje.29.2023.08.24.05.18.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Aug 2023 05:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2088c6e8-4921-47df-828b-0ac92bb63daf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 14:18:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: rdapp.gcc@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/111115 - SLP of masked stores Content-Language: en-US To: Richard Biener , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com References: From: Robin Dapp In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This causes an ICE in gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/gather-scatter/mask_gather_load-11.c (internal compiler error: in get_group_load_store_type, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:2121) #include #define TEST_LOOP(DATA_TYPE, INDEX_TYPE) \ void __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone)) \ f_##DATA_TYPE##_##INDEX_TYPE (DATA_TYPE *restrict y, DATA_TYPE *restrict x, \ INDEX_TYPE *restrict index, \ INDEX_TYPE *restrict cond) \ { \ for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) \ { \ if (cond[i * 2]) \ y[i * 2] = x[index[i * 2]] + 1; \ if (cond[i * 2 + 1]) \ y[i * 2 + 1] = x[index[i * 2 + 1]] + 2; \ } \ } TEST_LOOP (int8_t, int8_t) Is there now a mismatch with the LEN_ IFNs somewhere? Regards Robin