From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A85F139540A7 for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A85F139540A7 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 246GTtdt022304; Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:54 GMT Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fw78frah7-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 May 2022 16:46:54 +0000 Received: from m0098421.ppops.net (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 246GWg9k031215; Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:53 GMT Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3fw78frah1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 May 2022 16:46:53 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 246GSBJ0006789; Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:52 GMT Received: from b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.17]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3frvrakw97-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 06 May 2022 16:46:52 +0000 Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.130.236]) by b03cxnp08025.gho.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 246Gkpbu32637290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:51 GMT Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797CABE058; Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B3DBE054; Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.65.78.46] (unknown [9.65.78.46]) by b03ledav005.gho.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 6 May 2022 16:46:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <20e333b4-a4ce-6396-81a0-3769144a5d1b@linux.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 11:46:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.9.0 Subject: Re: Ping #5: [PATCH, V4] Eliminate power8 fusion options, use power8 tuning, PR target/102059 Content-Language: en-US To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: Michael Meissner , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, David Edelsohn , Will Schmidt References: <19f35375-0b89-1a4d-82f0-0f90521acf61@linux.ibm.com> <20220505193534.GG25951@gate.crashing.org> <20220505212733.GH25951@gate.crashing.org> From: Peter Bergner In-Reply-To: <20220505212733.GH25951@gate.crashing.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: P4r2eBkw7bcxBWTdyoUiXpnKHDmwQgbt X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: Z90rJun8sj-szk4V4LLjpoPP3sCWqKji X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.858,Hydra:6.0.486,FMLib:17.11.64.514 definitions=2022-05-06_05,2022-05-06_01,2022-02-23_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2202240000 definitions=main-2205060085 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 16:46:55 -0000 On 5/5/22 4:27 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:59:07PM -0500, Peter Bergner wrote: >> On 5/5/22 2:35 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: >>> Just an unconditional >>> >>> callee_isa &= ~OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION; >>> explicit_isa &= ~OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION; >>> >>> will do, no? That is fine since these options should never have been >>> used to determine if anything can be inlined, in the first place. >>> >>> A patch like that is pre-approved, even for trunk. >> >> That works for me! I will apply this directly to GCC 10 and regtest and >> push if clean so we can unblock our customer. >> >> As for trunk, GCC 12 & 11, I think we can wait for the backport of Mike's >> patch that removes the option altogether. > > Please put it on trunk and 12 and 11 as well. To keep things sane. Ok, pushed to trunk. I'll work on testing and committing the backports. Thanks! Peter