From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (1/4)
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:05:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <22252847.KzZaHhuiQ6@polaris> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mvm7f38o61e.fsf@suse.de>
> Thanks, this gets me further, the ada library now compiles with
> -mabi=ilp32.
Great, I think that you can apply it as obvious then, it's code which is only
exercised in Ada and on ILP32 64-bit platforms so the risk is very low...
> But I still see some ICEs while running the testsuite,
> which I haven't investigated yet. And the original comment before this
> hunk doesn't make sense at this point.
The hunk in the 'else' arm of the big surrounding conditional?
--
Eric Botcazou
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-29 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-04 20:10 [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-04 20:12 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (1/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-12 19:41 ` Jeff Law
2016-09-12 19:45 ` Jeff Law
2016-12-05 20:52 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-05 21:29 ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-05 22:41 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-05 22:12 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-06 17:52 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-06 20:18 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2016-12-06 21:59 ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-06 22:26 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-07 13:38 ` Lynn A. Boger
2016-12-07 13:56 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-12-07 7:23 ` Eric Botcazou
2017-03-23 16:48 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-03-28 17:01 ` Eric Botcazou
2017-03-29 10:05 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-03-29 14:05 ` Eric Botcazou [this message]
2017-03-29 14:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-09-04 20:14 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (2/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-04 20:15 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (3/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-09-05 10:52 ` Segher Boessenkool
2016-09-12 19:56 ` Jeff Law
2016-09-04 21:31 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (4/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-10-16 20:29 ` [patch v2] Get rid of stack trampolines for nested functions (0/4) Eric Botcazou
2016-10-17 10:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2016-10-17 11:14 ` Eric Botcazou
2016-10-17 22:35 ` Eric Botcazou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=22252847.KzZaHhuiQ6@polaris \
--to=ebotcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).