public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
To: "Michal Jankovič" <michal.jankovic59@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: coroutines - Overlap variables in frame [PR105989]
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:08:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <236E416B-F744-42C1-806C-4701DB1BAB55@sandoe.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BF6881FD-94D3-4E38-B1F0-B5042794233A@getmailspring.com>

Hi Michal,

> On 12 Jul 2022, at 14:35, Michal Jankovič via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> 
> Currently, coroutine frames store all variables of a coroutine separately,
> even if their lifetime does not overlap (they are in distinct scopes). This
> patch implements overlapping distinct variable scopes in the coroutine frame,
> by storing the frame fields in nested unions of structs. This lowers the size
> of the frame for larger coroutines significantly, and makes them more usable
> on systems with limited memory.

not a review (I will try to take a look at the weekend).

but … this is one of the two main optimisations on my TODO - so cool for doing it.

(the other related optimisation is to eliminate frame entries for scopes without any suspend
 points - which has the potential to save even more space for code with sparse use of co_xxxx)

Iain

> Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu; new test fails
> before the patch and succeeds after with no regressions.
> 
> 	PR c++/105989
> 
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* coroutines.cc (struct local_var_info): Add field_access_path.
> 	(build_local_var_frame_access_expr): New.
> 	(transform_local_var_uses): Use build_local_var_frame_access_expr.
> 	(coro_make_frame_entry_id): New.
> 	(coro_make_frame_entry): Delegate to coro_make_frame_entry_id.
> 	(struct local_vars_frame_data): Add orig, field_access_path.
> 	(register_local_var_uses): Generate new frame layout. Create access
> 	paths to vars.
> 	(morph_fn_to_coro): Set new fields in local_vars_frame_data. 
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* g++.dg/coroutines/pr105989.C: New test.
> 
> <pr105989.patch>


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-12 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-12 13:35 Michal Jankovič
2022-07-12 14:08 ` Iain Sandoe [this message]
2022-07-12 15:14   ` Michal Jankovič
2022-07-12 17:11     ` Iain Sandoe
2022-07-13 12:54       ` Michal Jankovic
2023-05-14 15:36         ` Michal Jankovič
2023-05-14 16:07           ` Iain Sandoe
2023-05-14 16:31             ` Michal Jankovič
2023-05-14 18:51               ` Iain Sandoe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=236E416B-F744-42C1-806C-4701DB1BAB55@sandoe.co.uk \
    --to=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=michal.jankovic59@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).