public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: PING^2 [PATCH v2] rs6000: Don't use optimize_function_for_speed_p too early [PR108184]
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 18:06:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <236d887a-ea18-3247-220e-ba56946318da@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3be17163-63ed-5d86-99fd-c7c8401c2796@linux.ibm.com>

Hi,

Gentle ping this:

https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609993.html

BR,
Kewen


> on 2023/1/16 17:08, Kewen.Lin via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As Honza pointed out in [1], the current uses of function
>> optimize_function_for_speed_p in rs6000_option_override_internal
>> are too early, since the query results from the functions
>> optimize_function_for_{speed,size}_p could be changed later due
>> to profile feedback and some function attributes handlings etc.
>>
>> This patch is to move optimize_function_for_speed_p to all the
>> use places of the corresponding flags, which follows the existing
>> practices.  Maybe we can cache it somewhere at an appropriate
>> timing, but that's another thing.
>>
>> Comparing with v1[2], this version added one test case for
>> SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT as Segher questioned and suggested, and it
>> also considered the possibility of explicit option (see test
>> cases pr108184-2.c and pr108184-4.c).  I believe that excepting
>> for the intentional change on optimize_function_for_{speed,
>> size}_p, there is no other function change.
>>
>> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607527.html
>> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/609379.html
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regtested on powerpc64-linux-gnu P8,
>> powerpc64le-linux-gnu P{9,10} and powerpc-ibm-aix.
>>
>> Is it ok for trunk?
>>
>> BR,
>> Kewen
>> -----
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 	* config/rs6000/rs6000.cc (rs6000_option_override_internal): Remove
>> 	all optimize_function_for_speed_p uses.
>> 	(fusion_gpr_load_p): Call optimize_function_for_speed_p along
>> 	with TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN.
>> 	(expand_fusion_gpr_load): Likewise.
>> 	(rs6000_call_aix): Call optimize_function_for_speed_p along with
>> 	TARGET_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT.
>> 	* config/rs6000/predicates.md (fusion_gpr_mem_load): Call
>> 	optimize_function_for_speed_p along with TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-1.c: New test.
>> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-2.c: New test.
>> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-3.c: New test.
>> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-4.c: New test.
>> ---
>>  gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md               |  5 +++-
>>  gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc                   | 19 +++++++++-----
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-1.c | 16 ++++++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-2.c | 15 +++++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-3.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-4.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  6 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-1.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-2.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-3.c
>>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-4.c
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
>> index a1764018545..9f84468db84 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
>> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/predicates.md
>> @@ -1878,7 +1878,10 @@ (define_predicate "fusion_gpr_mem_load"
>>
>>    /* Handle sign/zero extend.  */
>>    if (GET_CODE (op) == ZERO_EXTEND
>> -      || (TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN && GET_CODE (op) == SIGN_EXTEND))
>> +      || (TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN
>> +	  && GET_CODE (op) == SIGN_EXTEND
>> +	  && (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION_SIGN
>> +	      || optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun))))
>>      {
>>        op = XEXP (op, 0);
>>        mode = GET_MODE (op);
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
>> index 6ac3adcec6b..f47d21980a9 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.cc
>> @@ -3997,8 +3997,7 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
>>    /* If we can shrink-wrap the TOC register save separately, then use
>>       -msave-toc-indirect unless explicitly disabled.  */
>>    if ((rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT) == 0
>> -      && flag_shrink_wrap_separate
>> -      && optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun))
>> +      && flag_shrink_wrap_separate)
>>      rs6000_isa_flags |= OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT;
>>
>>    /* Enable power8 fusion if we are tuning for power8, even if we aren't
>> @@ -4032,7 +4031,6 @@ rs6000_option_override_internal (bool global_init_p)
>>       zero extending load, and an explicit sign extension.  */
>>    if (TARGET_P8_FUSION
>>        && !(rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION_SIGN)
>> -      && optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun)
>>        && optimize >= 3)
>>      rs6000_isa_flags |= OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION_SIGN;
>>
>> @@ -25690,7 +25688,10 @@ rs6000_call_aix (rtx value, rtx func_desc, rtx tlsarg, rtx cookie)
>>
>>  	  /* Can we optimize saving the TOC in the prologue or
>>  	     do we need to do it at every call?  */
>> -	  if (TARGET_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT && !cfun->calls_alloca)
>> +	  if (TARGET_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT
>> +	      && !cfun->calls_alloca
>> +	      && (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT
>> +		  || optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun)))
>>  	    cfun->machine->save_toc_in_prologue = true;
>>  	  else
>>  	    {
>> @@ -27557,7 +27558,10 @@ fusion_gpr_load_p (rtx addis_reg,	/* register set via addis.  */
>>
>>    /* Allow sign/zero extension.  */
>>    if (GET_CODE (mem) == ZERO_EXTEND
>> -      || (GET_CODE (mem) == SIGN_EXTEND && TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN))
>> +      || (GET_CODE (mem) == SIGN_EXTEND
>> +	  && TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN
>> +	  && (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION_SIGN
>> +	      || optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun))))
>>      mem = XEXP (mem, 0);
>>
>>    if (!MEM_P (mem))
>> @@ -27621,7 +27625,10 @@ expand_fusion_gpr_load (rtx *operands)
>>    enum rtx_code extend = UNKNOWN;
>>
>>    if (GET_CODE (orig_mem) == ZERO_EXTEND
>> -      || (TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN && GET_CODE (orig_mem) == SIGN_EXTEND))
>> +      || (TARGET_P8_FUSION_SIGN
>> +	  && GET_CODE (orig_mem) == SIGN_EXTEND
>> +	  && (rs6000_isa_flags_explicit & OPTION_MASK_P8_FUSION_SIGN
>> +	      || optimize_function_for_speed_p (cfun))))
>>      {
>>        extend = GET_CODE (orig_mem);
>>        orig_mem = XEXP (orig_mem, 0);
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-1.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..eae3bb9b7c4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>> +/* Only possible to fuse sign extended loads with the addis when
>> +   optimize >= 3 and Power8 fusion takes effects.  -mno-prefixed
>> +   ensures test point isn't broken (due to prefixed plha).  */
>> +/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-tune=power8 -O3 -mno-prefixed" } */
>> +
>> +/* Verify it doesn't optimize this function for speed as it's cold,
>> +   by checking it doesn't try to fuse sign extended loads with addis,
>> +   which results in a zero extended load and a sign extension.  */
>> +
>> +__attribute__ ((cold)) int
>> +fusion_short (short *p)
>> +{
>> +  return p[0x12345];
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not {\mextsh\M} } } */
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-2.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..9f703f7fc6b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-2.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>> +/* -mno-prefixed ensures test point isn't broken (due to prefixed plha).  */
>> +/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-tune=power8 -O2 -mpower8-fusion-sign -mno-prefixed" } */
>> +
>> +/* Verify the explicit option -mpower8-fusion-sign can still fuse
>> +   sign extended loads with addis, which results in a zero extended
>> +   load and a sign extension.  It means the cold attribute which
>> +   indicates to optimize for size doesn't affect.  */
>> +
>> +__attribute__ ((cold)) int
>> +fusion_short (short *p)
>> +{
>> +  return p[0x12345];
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mextsh\M} 1 } } */
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-3.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..ceaa96e4421
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-3.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-aix* powerpc*-*-linux* } } } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target fpic } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-fpic -mno-pcrel -O2" } */
>> +
>> +/* Verify it doesn't imply -msave-toc-indirect, so
>> +   it doesn't take effect and we have two separated
>> +   toc savings for these two long calls.  */
>> +
>> +void foo (void) __attribute__((__longcall__));
>> +int baz (void) __attribute__((__longcall__));
>> +
>> +__attribute__ ((cold)) int
>> +bar (void)
>> +{
>> +  foo ();
>> +  return baz () + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Linux LE */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd 2,24\(1\)} 2 { target powerpc_elfv2 } } } */
>> +/* Linux BE 64 bit or AIX 64 bit */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd 2,40\(1\)} 2 { target { lp64 && { ! powerpc_elfv2 } } } } } */
>> +/* AIX 32 bit */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstw 2,20\(1\)} 2 { target { ilp32 && powerpc*-*-aix* } } } } */
>> +
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-4.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-4.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..2a70a603047
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr108184-4.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-aix* powerpc*-*-linux* } } } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target fpic } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-fpic -mno-pcrel -O2 -msave-toc-indirect" } */
>> +
>> +/* Verify the explicit -msave-toc-indirect always
>> +   takes effect, so there is only one toc saving.  */
>> +
>> +void foo (void) __attribute__((__longcall__));
>> +int baz (void) __attribute__((__longcall__));
>> +
>> +__attribute__ ((cold)) int
>> +bar (void)
>> +{
>> +  foo ();
>> +  return baz () + 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Linux LE */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd 2,24\(1\)} 1 { target powerpc_elfv2 } } } */
>> +/* Linux BE 64 bit or AIX 64 bit */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstd 2,40\(1\)} 1 { target { lp64 && { ! powerpc_elfv2 } } } } } */
>> +/* AIX 32 bit */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mstw 2,20\(1\)} 1 { target { ilp32 && powerpc*-*-aix* } } } } */
>> +
>> --
>> 2.37.0
> 


BR,
Kewen

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-07 10:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-16  9:08 Kewen.Lin
2023-01-16  9:39 ` [PATCH/RFC] rs6000: Remove optimize_for_speed check for implicit TARGET_SAVE_TOC_INDIRECT [PR108184] Kewen.Lin
2023-01-17 20:57   ` Michael Meissner
2023-01-17 20:58     ` Michael Meissner
2023-01-18  9:04     ` Kewen.Lin
2023-06-15  6:41 ` PING^1 [PATCH v2] rs6000: Don't use optimize_function_for_speed_p too early [PR108184] Kewen.Lin
2023-08-07 10:06   ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2023-10-25  2:48     ` PING^3 " Kewen.Lin
2023-11-08  2:51       ` PING^4 " Kewen.Lin
2023-12-04  9:57         ` PING^5 " Kewen.Lin
2023-12-12  6:09           ` PING^6 " Kewen.Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=236d887a-ea18-3247-220e-ba56946318da@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).