From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55638 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2020 21:39:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 55629 invoked by uid 89); 12 Feb 2020 21:39:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=cmpsi X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (205.139.110.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:39:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1581543555; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8HLksB4wNWfQIlrQjpQGBq6+3vM5JifCAR8nNph2H3o=; b=YEkC7EKUXjF8JN8haL0AJoM4BT9zZmZdkacb3OiZptQe/pu8n5tQjtxnYuUb9DXJ3fY5vc Yf1uOjsBE+BARIg7UoXmWCzbzNKEldadzx09c0vWV9pUyCXZywZTZBF07jLQ9fOGM5h07u mY57iefqz4KvgY/GPRXJbP7xTPUYk7s= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-162-hUYonxOuOdG4ki95XXe9nQ-1; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:39:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C548014CD; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ovpn-118-11.phx2.redhat.com (ovpn-118-11.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.118.11]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F5A19C7F; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:39:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <241d00a5cabb62b38c6c1f83917510527a097353.camel@redhat.com> Subject: Re: Patch ping From: Jeff Law Reply-To: law@redhat.com To: Jakub Jelinek , Jason Merrill , Richard Earnshaw , Ramana Radhakrishnan , Kyrylo Tkachov Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:39:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20200210092415.GJ17695@tucnak> References: <20200210092415.GJ17695@tucnak> User-Agent: Evolution 3.34.3 (3.34.3-1.fc31) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg00750.txt.bz2 On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 10:24 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to ping a couple of patches: > > PR target/91913 - arm movsi + cmpsi -> movsi_compare0 peephole2 ICE fix > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-02/msg00010.html Letting the ARM guys deal with this. > > PR preprocessor/92319 - partially implement P1042R1: __VA_OPT__ wording clarifications > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2020-01/msg02104.html Jason for this one. > > PR target/93069 - avx512* rejects-valid fix (rejected by assembler) > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01606.html This is in my queue :-) > > PR tree-optimization/92868 - compute_objsize/gimple_call_alloc_size > /maybe_warn_overflow fixes > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01164.html Martin's patch should have addressed all the issues and should include your tests (tweaked, but supposed to be equivalent). jeff