From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20801 invoked by alias); 26 Mar 2008 17:35:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 20793 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Mar 2008 17:35:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:35:01 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so3116993fga.28 for ; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.182.1 with SMTP id e1mr535535buf.21.1206552897379; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.28.1 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <24b520d20803261034m60c1aafehe339f01342e33f44@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:21:00 -0000 From: "Doug Gregor" To: "Richard Guenther" Subject: Re: [C++/Obj-C++ PATCH] Fix Objective-C++ breakage Cc: NightStrike , "Andrew Pinski" , "GCC Patches" In-Reply-To: <84fc9c000803260616i2862867eq84f11a6cea2874a9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <24b520d20803251003h5f37d0b2rce7b55ade26afd18@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000803260347i12a6637bm95aa70426876d89c@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000803260616i2862867eq84f11a6cea2874a9@mail.gmail.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2008-03/txt/msg01607.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:10 PM, NightStrike wrote: > > > > On 3/26/08, Richard Guenther wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Doug Gregor wrote: > > > > > My SFINAE patch to the C++ front end broke the Objective-C++ front > > > > > end. This patch fixes the problem, which involves some renaming of > > > > > routines in the C++ front end as well as minor fixes to the > > > > > Objective-C++ front end. Okay for mainline? > > > > > > > > This is the third bootstrap failure for Objective-C++ in less than two > > > > weeks. I think it is either time to require Objective-C++ building or > > > > decide we should remove it. > > > > > > I agree. It is too tightly coupled to common C/C++ code to be not > > > enabled by default if it stays in. But you can add a +1 for the voting count > > > for removing the ObjC++ frontend. > > > > Why do you want to remove the frontend? > > Because it is basically unmaintained. Which means I don't even know whether I can commit this patch to *fix* the front end or not. I'll give it 24 more hours, and commit if I don't hear any screams. - Doug