public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Fix selftest for targets where short and int are the same size.
@ 2021-05-25  6:44 Aldy Hernandez
  2021-05-25 13:15 ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2021-05-25  6:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GCC patches

avr-elf seems to use HImode for both integer_type_node and
signed_char_type_node, which is causing the check for different sized
VARYING ranges to fail.

I've fixed this by using a char which I think should always be smaller than an
int.  Is there a preferred way of fixing this?  Perhaps build_nonstandard_integer
or __attribute__((mode(XX)))?

Tested on an x86-64 x avr-elf.

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* value-range.cc (range_tests_legacy): Use signed char instead
	of signed short.
---
 gcc/value-range.cc | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/value-range.cc b/gcc/value-range.cc
index 8d7b46c0239..5eefd5ff174 100644
--- a/gcc/value-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/value-range.cc
@@ -2251,10 +2251,10 @@ range_tests_legacy ()
 
   // VARYING of different sizes should not be equal.
   int_range_max r0 (integer_type_node);
-  int_range_max r1 (short_integer_type_node);
+  int_range_max r1 (signed_char_type_node);
   ASSERT_TRUE (r0 != r1);
   value_range vr0 (integer_type_node);
-  int_range_max vr1 (short_integer_type_node);
+  int_range_max vr1 (signed_char_type_node);
   ASSERT_TRUE (vr0 != vr1);
 }
 
-- 
2.31.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix selftest for targets where short and int are the same size.
  2021-05-25  6:44 [PATCH] Fix selftest for targets where short and int are the same size Aldy Hernandez
@ 2021-05-25 13:15 ` Jeff Law
  2021-05-25 16:36   ` Aldy Hernandez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2021-05-25 13:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aldy Hernandez, GCC patches



On 5/25/2021 12:44 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> avr-elf seems to use HImode for both integer_type_node and
> signed_char_type_node, which is causing the check for different sized
> VARYING ranges to fail.
>
> I've fixed this by using a char which I think should always be smaller than an
> int.  Is there a preferred way of fixing this?  Perhaps build_nonstandard_integer
> or __attribute__((mode(XX)))?
>
> Tested on an x86-64 x avr-elf.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 	* value-range.cc (range_tests_legacy): Use signed char instead
> 	of signed short.
As you note, I wonder if we should just creating our own types for this 
test.  In fact I wonder if that should be considered best practice for 
these tests.  Assumptions about the underlying sizes of the standard 
types has been slightly problematical for the range self-tests.

The alternate approach would be to check the underlying sizes/signedness 
and skip the tests when they don't give us what we need.  But that seems 
inferior to just creating a suitable type.

Jeff

ps.  xstormy16-elf seems to be failing in the same way.  I'll assume 
it's the same problem ;-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix selftest for targets where short and int are the same size.
  2021-05-25 13:15 ` Jeff Law
@ 2021-05-25 16:36   ` Aldy Hernandez
  2021-05-25 17:10     ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2021-05-25 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Law; +Cc: GCC patches, Andrew MacLeod

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1366 bytes --]

Ok, let's use build_nonstandard_integer_type which works for everyone
and gets you unblocked.

Pushed.

Aldy

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 3:15 PM Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 5/25/2021 12:44 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > avr-elf seems to use HImode for both integer_type_node and
> > signed_char_type_node, which is causing the check for different sized
> > VARYING ranges to fail.
> >
> > I've fixed this by using a char which I think should always be smaller than an
> > int.  Is there a preferred way of fixing this?  Perhaps build_nonstandard_integer
> > or __attribute__((mode(XX)))?
> >
> > Tested on an x86-64 x avr-elf.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >       * value-range.cc (range_tests_legacy): Use signed char instead
> >       of signed short.
> As you note, I wonder if we should just creating our own types for this
> test.  In fact I wonder if that should be considered best practice for
> these tests.  Assumptions about the underlying sizes of the standard
> types has been slightly problematical for the range self-tests.
>
> The alternate approach would be to check the underlying sizes/signedness
> and skip the tests when they don't give us what we need.  But that seems
> inferior to just creating a suitable type.
>
> Jeff
>
> ps.  xstormy16-elf seems to be failing in the same way.  I'll assume
> it's the same problem ;-)
>

[-- Attachment #2: latest.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1259 bytes --]

commit 41ddc5b0a6b44a9df53a259636fa3b534ae41cbe
Author: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue May 25 08:36:44 2021 +0200

    Fix selftest for targets where short and int are the same size.
    
    avr-elf seems to use HImode for both integer_type_node and
    signed_char_type_node, which is causing the check for different sized
    VARYING ranges to fail.
    
    gcc/ChangeLog:
    
            * value-range.cc (range_tests_legacy): Use
            build_nonstandard_integer_type instead of int and short.

diff --git a/gcc/value-range.cc b/gcc/value-range.cc
index 8d7b46c0239..f113fd7c905 100644
--- a/gcc/value-range.cc
+++ b/gcc/value-range.cc
@@ -2250,11 +2250,13 @@ range_tests_legacy ()
   }
 
   // VARYING of different sizes should not be equal.
-  int_range_max r0 (integer_type_node);
-  int_range_max r1 (short_integer_type_node);
+  tree big_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (32, 1);
+  tree small_type = build_nonstandard_integer_type (16, 1);
+  int_range_max r0 (big_type);
+  int_range_max r1 (small_type);
   ASSERT_TRUE (r0 != r1);
-  value_range vr0 (integer_type_node);
-  int_range_max vr1 (short_integer_type_node);
+  value_range vr0 (big_type);
+  int_range_max vr1 (small_type);
   ASSERT_TRUE (vr0 != vr1);
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Fix selftest for targets where short and int are the same size.
  2021-05-25 16:36   ` Aldy Hernandez
@ 2021-05-25 17:10     ` Jeff Law
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Law @ 2021-05-25 17:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aldy Hernandez; +Cc: GCC patches, Andrew MacLeod



On 5/25/2021 10:36 AM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> Ok, let's use build_nonstandard_integer_type which works for everyone
> and gets you unblocked.
Just to be clear, I'm not blocked on xstormy16.   The upstream GCC 
tester flagged the failure and I did enough triage to blame you :-) In 
my day job I'm working in another tree, so you can break the trunk 
willy-nilly and it won't block me.

jeff


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-05-25 17:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-05-25  6:44 [PATCH] Fix selftest for targets where short and int are the same size Aldy Hernandez
2021-05-25 13:15 ` Jeff Law
2021-05-25 16:36   ` Aldy Hernandez
2021-05-25 17:10     ` Jeff Law

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).