From: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: pan2.li <pan2.li@intel.com>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Robin Dapp" <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>,
jeffreyalaw <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
pan2.li <pan2.li@intel.com>,
yanzhang.wang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>,
kito.cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for vec_init repeating auto vectorization in RV32
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 15:43:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <250AB930CDD0CCAF+2023061415435666395330@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230614072900.3698145-1-pan2.li@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4011 bytes --]
+ /* We restrict the limit to the elen of RVV. For example:
+ -march=zve32*, the ELEN is 32.
+ -march=zve64*, the ELEN is 64.
+ The related vmv.v.x/vmv.s.x is restricted to ELEN as above, we cannot
+ take care of case like below when ELEN=32
+ vsetvil e64,m1
+ vmv.v.x/vmv.s.x
+ */
The comment is not clear enough.
How about:
According to RVV ISA SPEC, ELEN = 32 when -march=zve32* and ELEN = 64 when -march=zve64*.
Since vmv.v.x/vmv.s.x can't broadcast/move 64-bit value to the vector when ELEN = 32, we restrict the LIMIT to the ELEN.
I am not the native English speaker, I'd like to see Jeff or Robin comments that.
Thanks.
juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
From: pan2.li
Date: 2023-06-14 15:29
To: gcc-patches
CC: juzhe.zhong; rdapp.gcc; jeffreyalaw; pan2.li; yanzhang.wang; kito.cheng
Subject: [PATCH v2] RISC-V: Bugfix for vec_init repeating auto vectorization in RV32
From: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
This patch would like to fix one bug exported by RV32 test case
multiple_rgroup_run-2.c. The mask should be restricted by elen in
vector, and the condition between the vmv.s.x and the vmv.v.x should
take inner_bits_size rather than constants.
After this patch, below failures on RV32 will be fixed.
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/partial/multiple_rgroup_run-2.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.target/riscv/rvv/autovec/vls-vlmax/repeat_run-3.c -std=c99 -O3 -ftree-vectorize --param riscv-autovec-preference=fixed-vlmax execution test
Signed-off-by: Pan Li <pan2.li@intel.com>
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/riscv-v.cc (rvv_builder::get_merge_scalar_mask):
Take elen instead of scalar BITS_PER_WORD.
(expand_vector_init_merge_repeating_sequence): Use inner_bits_size
instead of scaler BITS_PER_WORD.
---
gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc | 18 ++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
index e07d5c2901a..db1a5529419 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-v.cc
@@ -399,10 +399,19 @@ rvv_builder::get_merge_scalar_mask (unsigned int index_in_pattern) const
{
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT mask = 0;
unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT base_mask = (1ULL << index_in_pattern);
+ /* We restrict the limit to the elen of RVV. For example:
+ -march=zve32*, the ELEN is 32.
+ -march=zve64*, the ELEN is 64.
+ The related vmv.v.x/vmv.s.x is restricted to ELEN as above, we cannot
+ take care of case like below when ELEN=32
+ vsetvil e64,m1
+ vmv.v.x/vmv.s.x
+ */
+ unsigned int elen = TARGET_VECTOR_ELEN_64 ? 64 : 32;
- gcc_assert (BITS_PER_WORD % npatterns () == 0);
+ gcc_assert (elen % npatterns () == 0);
- int limit = BITS_PER_WORD / npatterns ();
+ int limit = elen / npatterns ();
for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++)
mask |= base_mask << (i * npatterns ());
@@ -1928,7 +1937,7 @@ expand_vector_init_merge_repeating_sequence (rtx target,
rtx mask = gen_reg_rtx (mask_mode);
rtx dup = gen_reg_rtx (dup_mode);
- if (full_nelts <= BITS_PER_WORD) /* vmv.s.x. */
+ if (full_nelts <= builder.inner_bits_size ()) /* vmv.s.x. */
{
rtx ops[] = {dup, gen_scalar_move_mask (dup_mask_mode),
RVV_VUNDEF (dup_mode), merge_mask};
@@ -1938,7 +1947,8 @@ expand_vector_init_merge_repeating_sequence (rtx target,
else /* vmv.v.x. */
{
rtx ops[] = {dup, force_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (dup_mode), merge_mask)};
- rtx vl = gen_int_mode (CEIL (full_nelts, BITS_PER_WORD), Pmode);
+ rtx vl = gen_int_mode (CEIL (full_nelts, builder.inner_bits_size ()),
+ Pmode);
emit_nonvlmax_integer_move_insn (code_for_pred_broadcast (dup_mode),
ops, vl);
}
--
2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-14 7:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-14 0:58 [PATCH v1] " pan2.li
2023-06-14 1:07 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-06-14 7:30 ` Li, Pan2
2023-06-14 7:29 ` [PATCH v2] " pan2.li
2023-06-14 7:43 ` juzhe.zhong [this message]
2023-06-14 8:27 ` Robin Dapp
2023-06-14 8:34 ` Li, Pan2
2023-06-14 9:00 ` [PATCH v3] " pan2.li
2023-06-14 9:01 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-06-14 18:56 ` Jeff Law
2023-06-15 1:05 ` Li, Pan2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=250AB930CDD0CCAF+2023061415435666395330@rivai.ai \
--to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=pan2.li@intel.com \
--cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=yanzhang.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).