public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] c++: make manifestly_const_eval tri-state
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 15:02:18 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2561e459-73a1-c79e-0dbb-9fbe87da81de@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230127220250.1896137-1-ppalka@redhat.com>

On 1/27/23 17:02, Patrick Palka wrote:
> This patch turns the manifestly_const_eval flag used by the constexpr
> machinery into a tri-state enum so that we're able to express wanting
> to fold __builtin_is_constant_evaluated to false via late speculative
> constexpr evaluation.  Of all the entry points to constexpr evaluation
> only maybe_constant_value is changed to take a tri-state value; the
> others continue to take bool.  The subsequent patch will use this to fold
> the builtin to false when called from cp_fold_function.
> 
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* constexpr.cc (constexpr_call::manifestly_const_eval): Give
> 	it type int instead of bool.
> 	(constexpr_ctx::manifestly_const_eval): Give it type mce_value
> 	instead of bool.
> 	(cxx_eval_builtin_function_call): Adjust after making
> 	manifestly_const_eval tri-state.
> 	(cxx_eval_call_expression): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_eval_binary_expression): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_eval_conditional_expression): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_eval_constant_expression): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_constant_value): Likewise.
> 	(cxx_constant_dtor): Likewise.
> 	(maybe_constant_value): Give manifestly_const_eval parameter
> 	type mce_value instead of bool and adjust accordingly.
> 	(fold_non_dependent_expr_template): Adjust call
> 	to cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr.
> 	(fold_non_dependent_expr): Likewise.
> 	(maybe_constant_init_1): Likewise.
> 	* constraint.cc (satisfy_atom): Adjust call to
> 	maybe_constant_value.
> 	* cp-tree.h (enum class mce_value): Define.
> 	(maybe_constant_value): Adjust manifestly_const_eval parameter
> 	type and default argument.
> 	* decl.cc (compute_array_index_type_loc): Adjust call to
> 	maybe_constant_value.
> 	* pt.cc (convert_nontype_argument): Likewise.
> ---
>   gcc/cp/constexpr.cc  | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>   gcc/cp/constraint.cc |  3 +--
>   gcc/cp/cp-tree.h     | 18 ++++++++++++-
>   gcc/cp/decl.cc       |  2 +-
`>   gcc/cp/pt.cc         |  6 ++---
>   5 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
> index be99bec17e7..34662198903 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
> @@ -1119,8 +1119,8 @@ struct GTY((for_user)) constexpr_call {
>     /* The hash of this call; we remember it here to avoid having to
>        recalculate it when expanding the hash table.  */
>     hashval_t hash;
> -  /* Whether __builtin_is_constant_evaluated() should evaluate to true.  */
> -  bool manifestly_const_eval;
> +  /* The raw value of constexpr_ctx::manifestly_const_eval.  */
> +  int manifestly_const_eval;

Why not mce_value?

>   };
>   
>   struct constexpr_call_hasher : ggc_ptr_hash<constexpr_call>
> @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ struct constexpr_ctx {
>        trying harder to get a constant value.  */
>     bool strict;
>     /* Whether __builtin_is_constant_evaluated () should be true.  */
> -  bool manifestly_const_eval;
> +  mce_value manifestly_const_eval;
>   };
>   
>   /* This internal flag controls whether we should avoid doing anything during
> @@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@ cxx_eval_builtin_function_call (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t, tree fun,
>     /* If we aren't requiring a constant expression, defer __builtin_constant_p
>        in a constexpr function until we have values for the parameters.  */
>     if (bi_const_p
> -      && !ctx->manifestly_const_eval
> +      && ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_unknown
>         && current_function_decl
>         && DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (current_function_decl))
>       {
> @@ -1479,12 +1479,13 @@ cxx_eval_builtin_function_call (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t, tree fun,
>     if (fndecl_built_in_p (fun, CP_BUILT_IN_IS_CONSTANT_EVALUATED,
>   			 BUILT_IN_FRONTEND))
>       {
> -      if (!ctx->manifestly_const_eval)
> +      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_unknown)
>   	{
>   	  *non_constant_p = true;
>   	  return t;
>   	}
> -      return boolean_true_node;
> +      return constant_boolean_node (ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_true,
> +				    boolean_type_node);
>       }
>   
>     if (fndecl_built_in_p (fun, CP_BUILT_IN_SOURCE_LOCATION, BUILT_IN_FRONTEND))
> @@ -1591,7 +1592,7 @@ cxx_eval_builtin_function_call (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t, tree fun,
>       }
>   
>     bool save_ffbcp = force_folding_builtin_constant_p;
> -  force_folding_builtin_constant_p |= ctx->manifestly_const_eval;
> +  force_folding_builtin_constant_p |= ctx->manifestly_const_eval != mce_unknown;
>     tree save_cur_fn = current_function_decl;
>     /* Return name of ctx->call->fundef->decl for __builtin_FUNCTION ().  */
>     if (fndecl_built_in_p (fun, BUILT_IN_FUNCTION)
> @@ -2644,7 +2645,7 @@ cxx_eval_call_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
>     location_t loc = cp_expr_loc_or_input_loc (t);
>     tree fun = get_function_named_in_call (t);
>     constexpr_call new_call
> -    = { NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, ctx->manifestly_const_eval };
> +    = { NULL, NULL, NULL, 0, (int)ctx->manifestly_const_eval };
>     int depth_ok;
>   
>     if (fun == NULL_TREE)
> @@ -2916,7 +2917,7 @@ cxx_eval_call_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
>         location_t save_loc = input_location;
>         input_location = loc;
>         ++function_depth;
> -      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval)
> +      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_true)
>   	FNDECL_MANIFESTLY_CONST_EVALUATED (fun) = true;
>         instantiate_decl (fun, /*defer_ok*/false, /*expl_inst*/false);
>         --function_depth;
> @@ -3676,7 +3677,7 @@ cxx_eval_binary_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
>   
>     if (r == NULL_TREE)
>       {
> -      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval
> +      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_true
>   	  && (flag_constexpr_fp_except
>   	      || TREE_CODE (type) != REAL_TYPE))
>   	{
> @@ -3741,13 +3742,13 @@ cxx_eval_conditional_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
>   	 without manifestly_const_eval even expressions or parts thereof which
>   	 will later be manifestly const_eval evaluated), otherwise fold it to
>   	 true.  */
> -      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval)
> -	val = boolean_true_node;
> -      else
> +      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_unknown)
>   	{
>   	  *non_constant_p = true;
>   	  return t;
>   	}
> +      val = constant_boolean_node (ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_true,
> +				   boolean_type_node);
>       }
>     /* Don't VERIFY_CONSTANT the other operands.  */
>     if (integer_zerop (val))
> @@ -7055,7 +7056,7 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
>   	      r = v;
>   	      break;
>   	    }
> -      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval)
> +      if (ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_true)
>   	maybe_warn_about_constant_value (loc, t);
>         if (COMPLETE_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (t))
>   	  && is_really_empty_class (TREE_TYPE (t), /*ignore_vptr*/false))
> @@ -7644,7 +7645,7 @@ cxx_eval_constant_expression (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree t,
>   	if (TREE_CODE (t) == CONVERT_EXPR
>   	    && ARITHMETIC_TYPE_P (type)
>   	    && INDIRECT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op))
> -	    && ctx->manifestly_const_eval)
> +	    && ctx->manifestly_const_eval == mce_true)
>   	  {
>   	    if (!ctx->quiet)
>   	      error_at (loc,
> @@ -8137,7 +8138,7 @@ mark_non_constant (tree t)
>   static tree
>   cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool allow_non_constant,
>   				  bool strict = true,
> -				  bool manifestly_const_eval = false,
> +				  mce_value manifestly_const_eval = mce_unknown,
>   				  bool constexpr_dtor = false,
>   				  tree object = NULL_TREE)
>   {
> @@ -8155,10 +8156,11 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool allow_non_constant,
>     constexpr_global_ctx global_ctx;
>     constexpr_ctx ctx = { &global_ctx, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,
>   			allow_non_constant, strict,
> -			manifestly_const_eval || !allow_non_constant };
> +			!allow_non_constant ? mce_true : manifestly_const_eval };
>   
>     /* Turn off -frounding-math for manifestly constant evaluation.  */
> -  warning_sentinel rm (flag_rounding_math, ctx.manifestly_const_eval);
> +  warning_sentinel rm (flag_rounding_math,
> +		       ctx.manifestly_const_eval == mce_true);
>     tree type = initialized_type (t);
>     tree r = t;
>     bool is_consteval = false;
> @@ -8247,7 +8249,7 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool allow_non_constant,
>     auto_vec<tree, 16> cleanups;
>     global_ctx.cleanups = &cleanups;
>   
> -  if (manifestly_const_eval)
> +  if (manifestly_const_eval == mce_true)
>       instantiate_constexpr_fns (r);
>     r = cxx_eval_constant_expression (&ctx, r, vc_prvalue,
>   				    &non_constant_p, &overflow_p);
> @@ -8386,7 +8388,7 @@ cxx_constant_value (tree t, tree decl /* = NULL_TREE */,
>   		    tsubst_flags_t complain /* = tf_error */)
>   {
>     bool sfinae = !(complain & tf_error);
> -  tree r = cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, sfinae, true, true, false, decl);
> +  tree r = cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, sfinae, true, mce_true, false, decl);
>     if (sfinae && !TREE_CONSTANT (r))
>       r = error_mark_node;
>     return r;
> @@ -8398,7 +8400,7 @@ cxx_constant_value (tree t, tree decl /* = NULL_TREE */,
>   void
>   cxx_constant_dtor (tree t, tree decl)
>   {
> -  cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, false, true, true, true, decl);
> +  cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, false, true, mce_true, true, decl);
>   }
>   
>   /* Helper routine for fold_simple function.  Either return simplified
> @@ -8484,7 +8486,7 @@ static GTY((deletable)) hash_map<tree, tree> *cv_cache;
>   
>   tree
>   maybe_constant_value (tree t, tree decl /* = NULL_TREE */,
> -		      bool manifestly_const_eval /* = false */)
> +		      mce_value manifestly_const_eval /* = mce_unknown */)
>   {
>     tree r;
>   
> @@ -8499,8 +8501,9 @@ maybe_constant_value (tree t, tree decl /* = NULL_TREE */,
>       /* No caching or evaluation needed.  */
>       return t;
>   
> -  if (manifestly_const_eval)
> -    return cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, true, true, true, false, decl);
> +  if (manifestly_const_eval != mce_unknown)
> +    return cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, true, true,
> +					     manifestly_const_eval, false, decl);
>   
>     if (cv_cache == NULL)
>       cv_cache = hash_map<tree, tree>::create_ggc (101);
> @@ -8524,7 +8527,8 @@ maybe_constant_value (tree t, tree decl /* = NULL_TREE */,
>       return t;
>   
>     uid_sensitive_constexpr_evaluation_checker c;
> -  r = cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, true, true, false, false, decl);
> +  r = cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, true, true,
> +					manifestly_const_eval, false, decl);
>     gcc_checking_assert (r == t
>   		       || CONVERT_EXPR_P (t)
>   		       || TREE_CODE (t) == VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR
> @@ -8590,7 +8594,7 @@ fold_non_dependent_expr_template (tree t, tsubst_flags_t complain,
>   	return t;
>   
>         tree r = cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, true, true,
> -						 manifestly_const_eval,
> +						 mce_value (manifestly_const_eval),
>   						 false, object);
>         /* cp_tree_equal looks through NOPs, so allow them.  */
>         gcc_checking_assert (r == t
> @@ -8637,7 +8641,7 @@ fold_non_dependent_expr (tree t,
>       return fold_non_dependent_expr_template (t, complain,
>   					     manifestly_const_eval, object);
>   
> -  return maybe_constant_value (t, object, manifestly_const_eval);
> +  return maybe_constant_value (t, object, (mce_value)manifestly_const_eval);
>   }
>   
>   /* Like fold_non_dependent_expr, but if EXPR couldn't be folded to a constant,
> @@ -8715,7 +8719,8 @@ maybe_constant_init_1 (tree t, tree decl, bool allow_non_constant,
>         bool is_static = (decl && DECL_P (decl)
>   			&& (TREE_STATIC (decl) || DECL_EXTERNAL (decl)));
>         t = cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (t, allow_non_constant, !is_static,
> -					    manifestly_const_eval, false, decl);
> +					    mce_value (manifestly_const_eval),
> +					    false, decl);
>       }
>     if (TREE_CODE (t) == TARGET_EXPR)
>       {
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> index 2e5acdf8fcb..9374327008b 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/constraint.cc
> @@ -3068,8 +3068,7 @@ satisfy_atom (tree t, tree args, sat_info info)
>       }
>     else
>       {
> -      result = maybe_constant_value (result, NULL_TREE,
> -				     /*manifestly_const_eval=*/true);
> +      result = maybe_constant_value (result, NULL_TREE, mce_true);
>         if (!TREE_CONSTANT (result))
>   	result = error_mark_node;
>       }
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> index 74b7ab71ca5..2d39185b182 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
> @@ -8456,6 +8456,22 @@ struct GTY((for_user)) constexpr_fundef {
>     tree result;
>   };
>   
> +/* Used by the constexpr machinery to control folding of
> +   __builtin_is_constant_evaluated.  */

Add "Whether the current context is manifestly constant-evaluated." at 
the start.

> +enum class mce_value
> +{ > +  /* Treat __builtin_is_constant_evaluated as non-constant.  */

"Unknown, so..."

> +  mce_unknown = 0,
> +  /* Fold it to true.  */
> +  mce_true = 1,
> +  /* Fold it to false.  */

"Primarily used during cp_fold_function."

OK with these tweaks.

> +  mce_false = -1,
> +};
> +constexpr mce_value mce_unknown = mce_value::mce_unknown;
> +constexpr mce_value mce_true = mce_value::mce_true;
> +constexpr mce_value mce_false = mce_value::mce_false;
> +
>   extern void fini_constexpr			(void);
>   extern bool literal_type_p                      (tree);
>   extern void maybe_save_constexpr_fundef		(tree);
> @@ -8484,7 +8500,7 @@ inline tree cxx_constant_value (tree t, tsubst_flags_t complain)
>   { return cxx_constant_value (t, NULL_TREE, complain); }
>   extern void cxx_constant_dtor			(tree, tree);
>   extern tree cxx_constant_init			(tree, tree = NULL_TREE);
> -extern tree maybe_constant_value		(tree, tree = NULL_TREE, bool = false);
> +extern tree maybe_constant_value		(tree, tree = NULL_TREE, mce_value = mce_unknown);
>   extern tree maybe_constant_init			(tree, tree = NULL_TREE, bool = false);
>   extern tree fold_non_dependent_expr		(tree,
>   						 tsubst_flags_t = tf_warning_or_error,
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> index d606b31d7a7..a023c38c59d 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
> @@ -11372,7 +11372,7 @@ compute_array_index_type_loc (location_t name_loc, tree name, tree size,
>   				    cp_convert (ssizetype, integer_one_node,
>   						complain),
>   				    complain);
> -	itype = maybe_constant_value (itype, NULL_TREE, true);
> +	itype = maybe_constant_value (itype, NULL_TREE, mce_true);
>         }
>   
>         if (!TREE_CONSTANT (itype))
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> index 64e9128a5f1..4d82666891c 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
> @@ -7390,16 +7390,14 @@ convert_nontype_argument (tree type, tree expr, tsubst_flags_t complain)
>   	      IMPLICIT_CONV_EXPR_NONTYPE_ARG (expr) = true;
>   	      return expr;
>   	    }
> -	  expr = maybe_constant_value (expr, NULL_TREE,
> -				       /*manifestly_const_eval=*/true);
> +	  expr = maybe_constant_value (expr, NULL_TREE, mce_true);
>   	  expr = convert_from_reference (expr);
>   	  /* EXPR may have become value-dependent.  */
>   	  val_dep_p = value_dependent_expression_p (expr);
>   	}
>         else if (TYPE_PTR_OR_PTRMEM_P (type))
>   	{
> -	  tree folded = maybe_constant_value (expr, NULL_TREE,
> -					      /*manifestly_const_eval=*/true);
> +	  tree folded = maybe_constant_value (expr, NULL_TREE, mce_true);
>   	  if (TYPE_PTR_P (type) ? integer_zerop (folded)
>   	      : null_member_pointer_value_p (folded))
>   	    expr = folded;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-27 22:02 Patrick Palka
2023-01-27 22:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] c++: speculative constexpr and is_constant_evaluated [PR108243] Patrick Palka
2023-01-27 22:05   ` Patrick Palka
2023-01-30 20:05   ` Jason Merrill
2023-02-03 20:51     ` Patrick Palka
2023-02-03 20:57       ` Patrick Palka
2023-02-05 20:11       ` Jason Merrill
2023-02-09 17:36         ` Patrick Palka
2023-02-09 23:36           ` Jason Merrill
2023-02-10  1:32             ` Patrick Palka
2023-02-10 14:48               ` Patrick Palka
2023-02-10 16:51                 ` Patrick Palka
2023-02-14 23:02                   ` Jason Merrill
2023-01-30 20:02 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2023-02-03 21:21   ` [PATCH 1/2] c++: make manifestly_const_eval tri-state Patrick Palka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2561e459-73a1-c79e-0dbb-9fbe87da81de@redhat.com \
    --to=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).