From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] coroutines: Convert implementation variables to debug-friendly form.
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 10:12:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25efdb3f-f56b-2162-adf1-de8a446eda5f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17865D06-9212-499C-8A23-9914BE6FE1FB@sandoe.co.uk>
On 9/3/21 9:56 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
>
>> On 3 Sep 2021, at 14:52, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/1/21 6:55 AM, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>>> The user might well wish to inspect some of the state that represents
>>> the implementation of the coroutine machine.
>>> In particular:
>>> The promise object.
>>> The function pointers for the resumer and destroyer.
>>> The current resume index (suspend point).
>>> The handle that represent this coroutine 'self handle'.
>>> Whether the coroutine frame is allocated and needs to be freed.
>>> These variables are given names that can be 'well-known' and advertised
>>> in debug documentation - they are placed in the implementation namespace
>>> and all begin with _Coro_.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
>>> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>>> * coroutines.cc (transform_await_expr): Use debug-friendly
>>> names for coroutine implementation.
>>> (build_actor_fn): Likewise.
>>> (build_destroy_fn): Likewise.
>>> (coro_rewrite_function_body): Likewise.
>>> (morph_fn_to_coro): Likewise.
>>
>> Hmm, this patch doesn't seem to match the description and ChangeLog entry other than in the names of the functions changed.
>
> with 20:20 hindsight I should have squashed the (several) patches related to the implementation symbols,
>
> I’ll redo the description - essentially, this is just making use of the simplification available because we now have pre-defined values for the field names.
I can see how that describes a few lines in this patch, but not for
instance the change to transform_await_expr, which seems to have nothing
to do with names?
But yes, moving the changed lines that just use the variables from the
previous patch into that commit sounds good. I use rebase -i for that
sort of thing all the time.
>>> ---
>>> gcc/cp/coroutines.cc | 214 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
>>> index 3b46aac4dc5..aacf352f1c9 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/coroutines.cc
>>> @@ -1906,7 +1906,6 @@ transform_await_expr (tree await_expr, await_xform_data *xform)
>>> /* So, on entry, we have:
>>> in : CO_AWAIT_EXPR (a, e_proxy, o, awr_call_vector, mode)
>>> We no longer need a [it had diagnostic value, maybe?]
>>> - We need to replace the promise proxy in all elements
>>> We need to replace the e_proxy in the awr_call. */
>>> tree coro_frame_type = TREE_TYPE (xform->actor_frame);
>>> @@ -1932,16 +1931,6 @@ transform_await_expr (tree await_expr, await_xform_data *xform)
>>> TREE_OPERAND (await_expr, 1) = as;
>>> }
>>> - /* Now do the self_handle. */
>>> - data.from = xform->self_h_proxy;
>>> - data.to = xform->real_self_h;
>>> - cp_walk_tree (&await_expr, replace_proxy, &data, NULL);
>>> -
>>> - /* Now do the promise. */
>>> - data.from = xform->promise_proxy;
>>> - data.to = xform->real_promise;
>>> - cp_walk_tree (&await_expr, replace_proxy, &data, NULL);
>>> -
>>> return await_expr;
>>> }
>>> @@ -2128,10 +2117,9 @@ coro_get_frame_dtor (tree coro_fp, tree orig, tree frame_size,
>>> static void
>>> build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> - tree orig, hash_map<tree, param_info> *param_uses,
>>> - hash_map<tree, local_var_info> *local_var_uses,
>>> - vec<tree, va_gc> *param_dtor_list, tree resume_fn_field,
>>> - tree resume_idx_field, unsigned body_count, tree frame_size)
>>> + tree orig, hash_map<tree, local_var_info> *local_var_uses,
>>> + vec<tree, va_gc> *param_dtor_list,
>>> + tree resume_idx_var, unsigned body_count, tree frame_size)
>>> {
>>> verify_stmt_tree (fnbody);
>>> /* Some things we inherit from the original function. */
>>> @@ -2216,8 +2204,8 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> = {actor, actor_frame, coro_frame_type, loc, local_var_uses};
>>> cp_walk_tree (&fnbody, transform_local_var_uses, &xform_vars_data, NULL);
>>> - tree rat_field = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_resume_index_field, 1, 0,
>>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>>> + tree rat_field = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_resume_index_field,
>>> + 1, 0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree rat = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, short_unsigned_type_node, actor_frame,
>>> rat_field, NULL_TREE);
>>> @@ -2319,14 +2307,8 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> tree r = build_stmt (loc, LABEL_EXPR, actor_begin_label);
>>> add_stmt (r);
>>> - /* actor's version of the promise. */
>>> - tree ap_m = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, get_identifier ("_Coro_promise"), 1, 0,
>>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>>> - tree ap = build_class_member_access_expr (actor_frame, ap_m, NULL_TREE, false,
>>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>>> -
>>> /* actor's coroutine 'self handle'. */
>>> - tree ash_m = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, get_identifier ("_Coro_self_handle"), 1,
>>> + tree ash_m = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_self_handle_field, 1,
>>> 0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree ash = build_class_member_access_expr (actor_frame, ash_m, NULL_TREE,
>>> false, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> @@ -2347,36 +2329,13 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> decide where to put things. */
>>> await_xform_data xform
>>> - = {actor, actor_frame, promise_proxy, ap, self_h_proxy, ash};
>>> + = {actor, actor_frame, NULL_TREE, NULL_TREE, self_h_proxy, ash};
>>> /* Transform the await expressions in the function body. Only do each
>>> await tree once! */
>>> hash_set<tree> pset;
>>> cp_walk_tree (&fnbody, transform_await_wrapper, &xform, &pset);
>>> - /* Now replace the promise proxy with its real value. */
>>> - proxy_replace p_data;
>>> - p_data.from = promise_proxy;
>>> - p_data.to = ap;
>>> - cp_walk_tree (&fnbody, replace_proxy, &p_data, NULL);
>>> -
>>> - /* The rewrite of the function adds code to set the resume_fn field to
>>> - nullptr when the coroutine is done and also the index to zero when
>>> - calling an unhandled exception. These are represented by two proxies
>>> - in the function, so rewrite them to the proper frame access. */
>>> - tree resume_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, get_identifier ("_Coro_resume_fn"),
>>> - /*protect=*/1, /*want_type=*/0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> - tree res_x = build_class_member_access_expr (actor_frame, resume_m, NULL_TREE,
>>> - false, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> - p_data.from = resume_fn_field;
>>> - p_data.to = res_x;
>>> - cp_walk_tree (&fnbody, replace_proxy, &p_data, NULL);
>>> -
>>> - p_data.from = resume_idx_field;
>>> - p_data.to = rat;
>>> - cp_walk_tree (&fnbody, replace_proxy, &p_data, NULL);
>>> -
>>> /* Add in our function body with the co_returns rewritten to final form. */
>>> add_stmt (fnbody);
>>> @@ -2385,7 +2344,7 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> add_stmt (r);
>>> /* Destructors for the things we built explicitly. */
>>> - r = build_special_member_call (ap, complete_dtor_identifier, NULL,
>>> + r = build_special_member_call (promise_proxy, complete_dtor_identifier, NULL,
>>> promise_type, LOOKUP_NORMAL,
>>> tf_warning_or_error);
>>> add_stmt (r);
>>> @@ -2398,7 +2357,7 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> /* Here deallocate the frame (if we allocated it), which we will have at
>>> present. */
>>> tree fnf_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, get_identifier ("_Coro_frame_needs_free"), 1,
>>> + = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_frame_needs_free_field, 1,
>>> 0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree fnf2_x = build_class_member_access_expr (actor_frame, fnf_m, NULL_TREE,
>>> false, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> @@ -2477,18 +2436,10 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> gcc_checking_assert (maybe_cleanup_point_expr_void (r) == r);
>>> add_stmt (r);
>>> - /* We will need to know which resume point number should be encoded. */
>>> - tree res_idx_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_resume_index_field,
>>> - /*protect=*/1, /*want_type=*/0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> - tree resume_pt_number
>>> - = build_class_member_access_expr (actor_frame, res_idx_m, NULL_TREE, false,
>>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>>> -
>>> /* We've now rewritten the tree and added the initial and final
>>> co_awaits. Now pass over the tree and expand the co_awaits. */
>>> - coro_aw_data data = {actor, actor_fp, resume_pt_number, NULL_TREE,
>>> + coro_aw_data data = {actor, actor_fp, resume_idx_var, NULL_TREE,
>>> ash, del_promise_label, ret_label,
>>> continue_label, continuation, 2};
>>> cp_walk_tree (&actor_body, await_statement_expander, &data, NULL);
>>> @@ -2502,7 +2453,7 @@ build_actor_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree actor, tree fnbody,
>>> }
>>> /* The prototype 'destroy' function :
>>> - frame->__resume_at |= 1;
>>> + frame->__Coro_resume_index |= 1;
>>> actor (frame); */
>>> static void
>>> @@ -2521,10 +2472,10 @@ build_destroy_fn (location_t loc, tree coro_frame_type, tree destroy,
>>> tree destr_frame = build1 (INDIRECT_REF, coro_frame_type, destr_fp);
>>> - tree rat_field = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_resume_index_field, 1, 0,
>>> - tf_warning_or_error);
>>> - tree rat = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, short_unsigned_type_node, destr_frame,
>>> - rat_field, NULL_TREE);
>>> + tree rat_field = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_resume_index_field,
>>> + 1, 0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> + tree rat = build3 (COMPONENT_REF, short_unsigned_type_node,
>>> + destr_frame, rat_field, NULL_TREE);
>>> /* _resume_at |= 1 */
>>> tree dstr_idx = build2 (BIT_IOR_EXPR, short_unsigned_type_node, rat,
>>> @@ -4040,8 +3991,8 @@ coro_build_actor_or_destroy_function (tree orig, tree fn_type,
>>> static tree
>>> coro_rewrite_function_body (location_t fn_start, tree fnbody, tree orig,
>>> - tree resume_fn_ptr_type, tree& resume_fn_field,
>>> - tree& resume_idx_field, tree& fs_label)
>>> + tree resume_fn_ptr_type,
>>> + tree& resume_idx_var, tree& fs_label)
>>> {
>>> /* This will be our new outer scope. */
>>> tree update_body = build3 (BIND_EXPR, void_type_node, NULL, NULL, NULL);
>>> @@ -4074,7 +4025,6 @@ coro_rewrite_function_body (location_t fn_start, tree fnbody, tree orig,
>>> /* Wrap the function body in a try {} catch (...) {} block, if exceptions
>>> are enabled. */
>>> - tree promise = get_coroutine_promise_proxy (orig);
>>> tree var_list = NULL_TREE;
>>> tree initial_await = build_init_or_final_await (fn_start, false);
>>> @@ -4085,24 +4035,61 @@ coro_rewrite_function_body (location_t fn_start, tree fnbody, tree orig,
>>> tree return_void
>>> = get_coroutine_return_void_expr (current_function_decl, fn_start, false);
>>> + /* The pointer to the resume function. */
>>> + tree resume_fn_ptr
>>> + = coro_build_artificial_var (fn_start, coro_resume_fn_field,
>>> + resume_fn_ptr_type, orig, NULL_TREE);
>>> + DECL_CHAIN (resume_fn_ptr) = var_list;
>>> + var_list = resume_fn_ptr;
>>> + add_decl_expr (resume_fn_ptr);
>>> +
>>> /* We will need to be able to set the resume function pointer to nullptr
>>> to signal that the coroutine is 'done'. */
>>> - resume_fn_field
>>> - = build_lang_decl (VAR_DECL, get_identifier ("resume.fn.ptr.proxy"),
>>> - resume_fn_ptr_type);
>>> - DECL_ARTIFICIAL (resume_fn_field) = true;
>>> tree zero_resume
>>> = build1 (CONVERT_EXPR, resume_fn_ptr_type, integer_zero_node);
>>> - zero_resume
>>> - = build2 (INIT_EXPR, resume_fn_ptr_type, resume_fn_field, zero_resume);
>>> - /* Likewise, the resume index needs to be reset. */
>>> - resume_idx_field
>>> - = build_lang_decl (VAR_DECL, get_identifier ("resume.index.proxy"),
>>> - short_unsigned_type_node);
>>> - DECL_ARTIFICIAL (resume_idx_field) = true;
>>> - tree zero_resume_idx = build_int_cst (short_unsigned_type_node, 0);
>>> - zero_resume_idx = build2 (INIT_EXPR, short_unsigned_type_node,
>>> - resume_idx_field, zero_resume_idx);
>>> +
>>> + /* The pointer to the destroy function. */
>>> + tree var = coro_build_artificial_var (fn_start, coro_destroy_fn_field,
>>> + resume_fn_ptr_type, orig, NULL_TREE);
>>> + DECL_CHAIN (var) = var_list;
>>> + var_list = var;
>>> + add_decl_expr (var);
>>> +
>>> + /* The promise was created on demand when parsing we now link it into
>>> + our scope. */
>>> + tree promise = get_coroutine_promise_proxy (orig);
>>> + DECL_CONTEXT (promise) = orig;
>>> + DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (promise) = fn_start;
>>> + DECL_CHAIN (promise) = var_list;
>>> + var_list = promise;
>>> + add_decl_expr (promise);
>>> +
>>> + /* We need a handle to this coroutine, which is passed to every
>>> + await_suspend(). This was created on demand when parsing we now link it
>>> + into our scope. */
>>> + var = get_coroutine_self_handle_proxy (orig);
>>> + DECL_CONTEXT (var) = orig;
>>> + DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (var) = fn_start;
>>> + DECL_CHAIN (var) = var_list;
>>> + var_list = var;
>>> + add_decl_expr (var);
>>> +
>>> +
>>> + /* We create a resume index, this is initialized in the ramp. */
>>> + resume_idx_var
>>> + = coro_build_artificial_var (fn_start, coro_resume_index_field,
>>> + short_unsigned_type_node, orig, NULL_TREE);
>>> + DECL_CHAIN (resume_idx_var) = var_list;
>>> + var_list = resume_idx_var;
>>> + add_decl_expr (resume_idx_var);
>>> +
>>> + /* If the coroutine has a frame that needs to be freed, this will be set by
>>> + the ramp. */
>>> + var = coro_build_artificial_var (fn_start, coro_frame_needs_free_field,
>>> + boolean_type_node, orig, NULL_TREE);
>>> + DECL_CHAIN (var) = var_list;
>>> + var_list = var;
>>> + add_decl_expr (var);
>>> if (flag_exceptions)
>>> {
>>> @@ -4166,10 +4153,14 @@ coro_rewrite_function_body (location_t fn_start, tree fnbody, tree orig,
>>> If the unhandled exception method returns, then we continue
>>> to the final await expression (which duplicates the clearing of
>>> the field). */
>>> - finish_expr_stmt (zero_resume);
>>> - finish_expr_stmt (zero_resume_idx);
>>> - ueh = maybe_cleanup_point_expr_void (ueh);
>>> - add_stmt (ueh);
>>> + tree r = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, resume_fn_ptr_type, resume_fn_ptr,
>>> + zero_resume);
>>> + finish_expr_stmt (r);
>>> + tree short_zero = build_int_cst (short_unsigned_type_node, 0);
>>> + r = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, short_unsigned_type_node, resume_idx_var,
>>> + short_zero);
>>> + finish_expr_stmt (r);
>>> + finish_expr_stmt (ueh);
>>> finish_handler (handler);
>>> TRY_HANDLERS (tcb) = pop_stmt_list (TRY_HANDLERS (tcb));
>>> }
>>> @@ -4204,6 +4195,8 @@ coro_rewrite_function_body (location_t fn_start, tree fnbody, tree orig,
>>> /* Before entering the final suspend point, we signal that this point has
>>> been reached by setting the resume function pointer to zero (this is
>>> what the 'done()' builtin tests) as per the current ABI. */
>>> + zero_resume = build2 (MODIFY_EXPR, resume_fn_ptr_type, resume_fn_ptr,
>>> + zero_resume);
>>> finish_expr_stmt (zero_resume);
>>> finish_expr_stmt (build_init_or_final_await (fn_start, true));
>>> BIND_EXPR_BODY (update_body) = pop_stmt_list (BIND_EXPR_BODY (update_body));
>>> @@ -4348,33 +4341,16 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
>>> /* Construct the wrapped function body; we will analyze this to determine
>>> the requirements for the coroutine frame. */
>>> - tree resume_fn_field = NULL_TREE;
>>> - tree resume_idx_field = NULL_TREE;
>>> + tree resume_idx_var = NULL_TREE;
>>> tree fs_label = NULL_TREE;
>>> fnbody = coro_rewrite_function_body (fn_start, fnbody, orig,
>>> - act_des_fn_ptr, resume_fn_field,
>>> - resume_idx_field, fs_label);
>>> + act_des_fn_ptr,
>>> + resume_idx_var, fs_label);
>>> /* Build our dummy coro frame layout. */
>>> coro_frame_type = begin_class_definition (coro_frame_type);
>>> + /* The fields for the coro frame. */
>>> tree field_list = NULL_TREE;
>>> - tree resume_name
>>> - = coro_make_frame_entry (&field_list, "_Coro_resume_fn",
>>> - act_des_fn_ptr, fn_start);
>>> - tree destroy_name
>>> - = coro_make_frame_entry (&field_list, "_Coro_destroy_fn",
>>> - act_des_fn_ptr, fn_start);
>>> - tree promise_name
>>> - = coro_make_frame_entry (&field_list, "_Coro_promise", promise_type, fn_start);
>>> - tree fnf_name = coro_make_frame_entry (&field_list, "_Coro_frame_needs_free",
>>> - boolean_type_node, fn_start);
>>> - tree resume_idx_name
>>> - = coro_make_frame_entry (&field_list, "_Coro_resume_index",
>>> - short_unsigned_type_node, fn_start);
>>> -
>>> - /* We need a handle to this coroutine, which is passed to every
>>> - await_suspend(). There's no point in creating it over and over. */
>>> - (void) coro_make_frame_entry (&field_list, "_Coro_self_handle", handle_type, fn_start);
>>> /* Now add in fields for function params (if there are any).
>>> We do not attempt elision of copies at this stage, we do analyze the
>>> @@ -4776,8 +4752,8 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
>>> /* For now, once allocation has succeeded we always assume that this needs
>>> destruction, there's no impl. for frame allocation elision. */
>>> - tree fnf_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, fnf_name, 1, 0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> + tree fnf_m = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_frame_needs_free_field,
>>> + 1, 0,tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree fnf_x = build_class_member_access_expr (deref_fp, fnf_m, NULL_TREE,
>>> false, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> r = build2 (INIT_EXPR, boolean_type_node, fnf_x, boolean_true_node);
>>> @@ -4788,24 +4764,22 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
>>> tree actor_addr = build1 (ADDR_EXPR, act_des_fn_ptr, actor);
>>> tree resume_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, resume_name,
>>> + = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_resume_fn_field,
>>> /*protect=*/1, /*want_type=*/0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree resume_x = build_class_member_access_expr (deref_fp, resume_m, NULL_TREE,
>>> false, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> r = build2_loc (fn_start, INIT_EXPR, act_des_fn_ptr, resume_x, actor_addr);
>>> - r = coro_build_cvt_void_expr_stmt (r, fn_start);
>>> - add_stmt (r);
>>> + finish_expr_stmt (r);
>>> tree destroy_addr = build1 (ADDR_EXPR, act_des_fn_ptr, destroy);
>>> tree destroy_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, destroy_name,
>>> + = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_destroy_fn_field,
>>> /*protect=*/1, /*want_type=*/0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree destroy_x
>>> = build_class_member_access_expr (deref_fp, destroy_m, NULL_TREE, false,
>>> tf_warning_or_error);
>>> r = build2_loc (fn_start, INIT_EXPR, act_des_fn_ptr, destroy_x, destroy_addr);
>>> - r = coro_build_cvt_void_expr_stmt (r, fn_start);
>>> - add_stmt (r);
>>> + finish_expr_stmt (r);
>>> /* [dcl.fct.def.coroutine] /13
>>> When a coroutine is invoked, a copy is created for each coroutine
>>> @@ -4896,7 +4870,7 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
>>> /* Set up the promise. */
>>> tree promise_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, promise_name,
>>> + = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_promise_field,
>>> /*protect=*/1, /*want_type=*/0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree p = build_class_member_access_expr (deref_fp, promise_m, NULL_TREE,
>>> @@ -5042,9 +5016,9 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
>>> boolean_type_node);
>>> finish_expr_stmt (r);
>>> }
>>> - /* Initialize the resume_idx_name to 0, meaning "not started". */
>>> + /* Initialize the resume_idx_var to 0, meaning "not started". */
>>> tree resume_idx_m
>>> - = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, resume_idx_name,
>>> + = lookup_member (coro_frame_type, coro_resume_index_field,
>>> /*protect=*/1, /*want_type=*/0, tf_warning_or_error);
>>> tree resume_idx
>>> = build_class_member_access_expr (deref_fp, resume_idx_m, NULL_TREE, false,
>>> @@ -5187,9 +5161,9 @@ morph_fn_to_coro (tree orig, tree *resumer, tree *destroyer)
>>> push_deferring_access_checks (dk_no_check);
>>> /* Build the actor... */
>>> - build_actor_fn (fn_start, coro_frame_type, actor, fnbody, orig, param_uses,
>>> - &local_var_uses, param_dtor_list, resume_fn_field,
>>> - resume_idx_field, body_aw_points.await_number, frame_size);
>>> + build_actor_fn (fn_start, coro_frame_type, actor, fnbody, orig,
>>> + &local_var_uses, param_dtor_list,
>>> + resume_idx_var, body_aw_points.await_number, frame_size);
>>> /* Destroyer ... */
>>> build_destroy_fn (fn_start, coro_frame_type, destroy, actor);
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-03 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-01 10:51 [PATCH 0/8] coroutines: Use DECL_VALUE_EXPRs to assist in debug [PR99215] Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:52 ` [PATCH 1/8] coroutines : Use DECL_VALUE_EXPR instead of rewriting vars Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/8] coroutines: Add a helper for creating local vars Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:53 ` PATCH 3/8] coroutines: Support for debugging implementation state Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:54 ` [PATCH 4/8] coroutines: Make some of the artificial names more debugger-friendly Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:54 ` [PATCH 5/8] coroutines: Define and populate accessors for debug state Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:55 ` [PATCH 6/8] coroutines: Convert implementation variables to debug-friendly form Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:56 ` [PATCH 7/8] coroutines: Make proxy vars for the function arg copies Iain Sandoe
2021-09-01 10:56 ` [PATCH 8/8] coroutines: Make the continue handle visible to debug Iain Sandoe
2021-09-03 14:25 ` Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 14:07 ` [PATCH 7/8] coroutines: Make proxy vars for the function arg copies Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 14:23 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-09-05 19:50 ` [PATCH 7/8 v2] " Iain Sandoe
2021-09-07 17:26 ` Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 13:52 ` [PATCH 6/8] coroutines: Convert implementation variables to debug-friendly form Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 13:56 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-09-03 14:12 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2021-09-03 14:21 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-09-05 19:47 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-09-07 17:23 ` Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 13:39 ` [PATCH 5/8] coroutines: Define and populate accessors for debug state Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 13:41 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-09-03 13:42 ` Iain Sandoe
2021-09-03 13:44 ` Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 13:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] coroutines: Make some of the artificial names more debugger-friendly Jason Merrill
2021-09-03 13:31 ` PATCH 3/8] coroutines: Support for debugging implementation state Jason Merrill
2021-09-02 21:52 ` [PATCH 2/8] coroutines: Add a helper for creating local vars Jason Merrill
2021-09-02 21:51 ` [PATCH 1/8] coroutines : Use DECL_VALUE_EXPR instead of rewriting vars Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25efdb3f-f56b-2162-adf1-de8a446eda5f@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).