public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@arm.com>
To: Kyrill Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][ARM] Fix wrong code by arm_final_prescan with fp16 move instructions
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2662e77b-cf75-8072-d6ef-14e184ce95c1@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5A1C0434.5000109@foss.arm.com>

Hi Kyrill

On 27/11/17 12:25, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi Sudi,
>
> On 24/11/17 14:57, Sudi Das wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> For the following test case:
>> __fp16
>> test_select (__fp16 a, __fp16 b, __fp16 c)
>> {
>>    return (a < b) ? b : c;
>> }
>>
>> when compiled with -mfpu=fp-armv8 -march=armv8.2-a+fp16 -marm
>> -mfloat-abi=hard trunk generates wrong code:
>>
>> test_select:
>>          @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
>>          @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
>>          @ link register save eliminated.
>>          vcvtb.f32.f16   s0, s0
>>          vcvtb.f32.f16   s15, s1
>>          vcmpe.f32       s0, s15
>>          vmrs    APSR_nzcv, FPSCR
>>          // <------ No conditional branch!
>>          vmov    s1, s2  @ __fp16
>> .L2:
>>          vmov    s0, s1  @ __fp16
>>          bx      lr
>>
>> There should have been a conditional branch there to skip one of the
>> VMOVs.
>> This patch fixes this problem by making *movhf_vfp_fp16 unconditional
>> wherever needed.
>>
>> Testing done: Add a new test case and checked for regressions
>> arm-none-linux-gnueabihf.
>>
>> Is this ok for trunk?
>>
>
> This is ok after assuming a bootstrap on arm-none-linux-gnueabihf passes
> as well.
> Does this bug appear on the GCC 7 branch?
> If so, could you please test this patch on that branch as well if so?
>

I have tested the patch and also sent a new patch request for gcc-7
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-11/msg02577.html

Thanks
Sudi

> Thanks,
> Kyrill
>
>> Sudi
>>
>> ChangeLog entry are as follow:
>>
>> *** gcc/ChangeLog ***
>>
>> 2017-11-24  Sudakshina Das  <sudi.das@arm.com>
>>
>>         * config/arm/vfp.md (*movhf_vfp_fp16): Add conds attribute.
>>
>> *** gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog ***
>>
>> 2017-11-24  Sudakshina Das  <sudi.das@arm.com>
>>
>>         * gcc.target/arm/armv8_2-fp16-move-2.c: New test.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-30 16:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-24 15:44 Sudakshina Das
2017-11-27 12:39 ` Kyrill Tkachov
2017-11-30 16:08   ` Sudakshina Das [this message]
2017-11-30 16:28     ` Kyrill Tkachov
2017-12-01 10:18       ` Sudakshina Das

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2662e77b-cf75-8072-d6ef-14e184ce95c1@arm.com \
    --to=sudi.das@arm.com \
    --cc=Ramana.Radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kyrylo.tkachov@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).