From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-333914-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13289 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2012 21:07:21 -0000
Received: (qmail 13237 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2012 21:07:20 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.6 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_NO,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:07:15 +0000
Received: from omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.36])	by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id ZnPK1k0070mv7h053x7EHg; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:07:14 +0000
Received: from bag6-1-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net ([IPv6:2001:470:1f04:ae1::2])	by omta11.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast	id Zx7C1k00v0P3DwE3Xx7Daq; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:07:14 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH i386]: Enable push/pop in pro/epilogue for modern CPUs
From: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAAkRFZK5pguC2j3j3Pi5gLEhkLzG8sj+5RSW3j9xkk91+a7ezA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 21:07:00 -0000
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>, Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2679866A-C8BE-4F73-B417-C0A8140D6E99@comcast.net>
References: <CAFULd4Z4hGXfjF-VXdazsnSQpnBszLxQidaVVOsZddZx0ep69w@mail.gmail.com>	<CAFiYyc150rLk2yuiMVQAiUN+4sYJ_UsAW9L2UwVhEV1hi_6GQA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAkRFZK5pguC2j3j3Pi5gLEhkLzG8sj+5RSW3j9xkk91+a7ezA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00656.txt.bz2

On Dec 10, 2012, at 12:42 PM, Xinliang David Li <davidxl@google.com> wrote:
> I have not measured the CFI size impact -- but conceivably it should
> be larger -- which is unfortunate.

Code speed and size are preferable to optimizing dwarf size=85  :-)  I'd le=
t dwarf 5 fix it!