From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-455610-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 126996 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2017 09:44:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 124588 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jun 2017 09:44:30 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=night, risk
X-HELO: foss.arm.com
Received: from foss.arm.com (HELO foss.arm.com) (217.140.101.70) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:44:28 +0000
Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.72.51.249])	by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DA92B;	Sat, 10 Jun 2017 02:44:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.19] (usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com [217.140.101.70])	by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9660E3F587;	Sat, 10 Jun 2017 02:44:28 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [PATCH, ARM/AArch64] drop aarch32 support for falkor/qdf24xx
To: Jim Wilson <jim.wilson@linaro.org>
References: <CABXYE2VG6iYFgRKxVQcFjoJEeSWUnyP+Vgq-P=NR67u+wStE=g@mail.gmail.com> <6ebb24ef-0912-cf5f-74a4-b4acd372dbf4@arm.com> <CABXYE2XMkTimK2vdZupJ6wOZNkG5m9z=P2aF7fM0jtZFspgz-A@mail.gmail.com> <a569aa5f-121b-7ea0-401d-79da1f34292b@arm.com> <CABXYE2UNTU44gX1cvej0QEmAusyHCgTPzRgYe11jX4SQ7jEN3A@mail.gmail.com> <8a59f4fc-5450-ff42-aabd-bb32da42cd89@arm.com> <a7897e0b-3ceb-c1a3-081c-215fc73643bf@arm.com> <CABXYE2WrqwzT4=J+BjAvbAGZwzKG83KMZ96uU1ycq6Lx6uFfHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
Message-ID: <26836903-3626-75be-a376-d5decca60f8e@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 09:44:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABXYE2WrqwzT4=J+BjAvbAGZwzKG83KMZ96uU1ycq6Lx6uFfHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00705.txt.bz2

On 09/06/17 21:03, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
> <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com> wrote:
>> Having pondered this over night, I think the lowest risk thing to do,
>> provided it applies cleanly to the gcc-7 branch, is just commit the
>> entire patch on the branch and be done with it.  The risk from removing
>> this code is pretty minimal and removing it all is the best way of
>> avoiding things like unexpected compiler warnings breaking the build.
>> If it doesn't apply cleanly, then just drop the documentation.
> 
> The patch backports cleanly.  I've tested the patch on the
> gcc-7-branch, with both armv8 and aarch64 bootstraps and make checks,
> with no regressions.  Ok to check in?
> 
> Jim
> 

OK.

R.