From: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: [pushed][PR112918][LRA]: Fixing IRA ICE on m68k
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:16:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <269d021e-7aad-22de-1469-f332abbfede9@redhat.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 341 bytes --]
The following patch fixes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112918
The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86-64, aarch64,
and ppc64.
The patch affects a sensitive part of LRA. So I will monitor that the
commit does not create serious failures on other targets. If it happens,
I probably revert the patch.
[-- Attachment #2: pr112918.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 3918 bytes --]
commit 989e67f827b74b76e58abe137ce12d948af2290c
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
Date: Mon Dec 18 17:12:23 2023 -0500
[PR112918][LRA]: Fixing IRA ICE on m68k
Some GCC tests on m68K port of LRA is failed on `maximum number of
generated reload insns per insn achieved`. The problem is in that for
subreg reload LRA can not narrow reg class more from ALL_REGS to
GENERAL_REGS and then to data regs or address regs. The patch permits
narowing reg class from reload insns if this results in succesful
matching of reg operand.
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR rtl-optimization/112918
* lra-constraints.cc (SMALL_REGISTER_CLASS_P): Move before in_class_p.
(in_class_p): Restrict condition for narrowing class in case of
allow_all_reload_class_changes_p.
(process_alt_operands): Pass true for
allow_all_reload_class_changes_p in calls of in_class_p.
(curr_insn_transform): Ditto for reg operand win.
diff --git a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
index da7e1748d75..05479ab98dd 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
+++ b/gcc/lra-constraints.cc
@@ -261,6 +261,13 @@ enough_allocatable_hard_regs_p (enum reg_class reg_class,
return false;
}
+/* True if C is a non-empty register class that has too few registers
+ to be safely used as a reload target class. */
+#define SMALL_REGISTER_CLASS_P(C) \
+ (ira_class_hard_regs_num [(C)] == 1 \
+ || (ira_class_hard_regs_num [(C)] >= 1 \
+ && targetm.class_likely_spilled_p (C)))
+
/* Return true if REG satisfies (or will satisfy) reg class constraint
CL. Use elimination first if REG is a hard register. If REG is a
reload pseudo created by this constraints pass, assume that it will
@@ -318,7 +325,11 @@ in_class_p (rtx reg, enum reg_class cl, enum reg_class *new_class,
common_class = ira_reg_class_subset[rclass][cl];
if (new_class != NULL)
*new_class = common_class;
- return enough_allocatable_hard_regs_p (common_class, reg_mode);
+ return (enough_allocatable_hard_regs_p (common_class, reg_mode)
+ /* Do not permit reload insn operand matching (new_class == NULL
+ case) if the new class is too small. */
+ && (new_class != NULL || common_class == rclass
+ || !SMALL_REGISTER_CLASS_P (common_class)));
}
}
@@ -923,13 +934,6 @@ operands_match_p (rtx x, rtx y, int y_hard_regno)
&& GET_MODE_SIZE (MODE).is_constant () \
&& !targetm.cannot_force_const_mem (MODE, X))
-/* True if C is a non-empty register class that has too few registers
- to be safely used as a reload target class. */
-#define SMALL_REGISTER_CLASS_P(C) \
- (ira_class_hard_regs_num [(C)] == 1 \
- || (ira_class_hard_regs_num [(C)] >= 1 \
- && targetm.class_likely_spilled_p (C)))
-
/* If REG is a reload pseudo, try to make its class satisfying CL. */
static void
narrow_reload_pseudo_class (rtx reg, enum reg_class cl)
@@ -2631,7 +2635,7 @@ process_alt_operands (int only_alternative)
hard_regno[nop]))))
win = true;
else if (hard_regno[nop] < 0
- && in_class_p (op, this_alternative, NULL))
+ && in_class_p (op, this_alternative, NULL, true))
win = true;
}
break;
@@ -2675,7 +2679,7 @@ process_alt_operands (int only_alternative)
reject++;
}
if (in_class_p (operand_reg[nop],
- this_costly_alternative, NULL))
+ this_costly_alternative, NULL, true))
{
if (lra_dump_file != NULL)
fprintf
@@ -4388,7 +4392,7 @@ curr_insn_transform (bool check_only_p)
if (REG_P (reg) && (regno = REGNO (reg)) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
{
- bool ok_p = in_class_p (reg, goal_alt[i], &new_class);
+ bool ok_p = in_class_p (reg, goal_alt[i], &new_class, true);
if (new_class != NO_REGS && get_reg_class (regno) != new_class)
{
next reply other threads:[~2023-12-18 22:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-18 22:16 Vladimir Makarov [this message]
2023-12-19 0:05 ` Jeff Law
2023-12-19 3:34 ` Jeff Law
2023-12-20 20:35 ` Joseph Myers
2024-01-11 14:35 Vladimir Makarov
2024-01-12 14:33 ` YunQiang Su
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=269d021e-7aad-22de-1469-f332abbfede9@redhat.com \
--to=vmakarov@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).