public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
	Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: RISC-V: Add divmod instruction support
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 14:07:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ca669c-70ce-e475-717e-3c36f1e1c703@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2302181848430.25434@angie.orcam.me.uk>



On 2/18/23 12:31, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2023, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches wrote:
> 
>>>> If we have division and remainder calculations with the same operands:
>>>>
>>>>    a = b / c;
>>>>    d = b % c;
>>>>
>>>> We can replace the calculation of remainder with multiplication +
>>>> subtraction, using the result from the previous division:
>>>>
>>>>    a = b / c;
>>>>    d = a * c;
>>>>    d = b - d;
>>>>
>>>> Which will be faster.
>>>
>>> Do you have any benchmarks that show that performance increase?  The ISA
>>> manual specifically says the suggested sequence is div+mod, and while
>>> those suggestions don't always pan out for real hardware it's likely
>>> that at least some implementations will end up with the ISA-suggested
>>> fusions.
>>
>> I suspect I will be needing this kind of patch for the core that I am
>> going to be using.
>> If anything this should be under a tuning option.
> 
>   Barring the fusion case, which indeed asks for a dedicated `divmod'
> pattern (and then I suppose a post-reload splitter or a peephole so that
> where one of the two results produced has eventually turned out unused, we
> have means to discard the unneeded machine instruction), isn't the generic
> transformation something for the middle end to do based on RTX costs?
I originally though the same way you did Maciej.

The problem is you don't see it as a divmod in expand_divmod unless you 
expose a divmod optab.  See tree-ssa-mathopts.cc's divmod handling.

jeff


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-18 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-17 14:02 Matevos Mehrabyan
2023-02-18 18:26 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-18 18:42   ` Andrew Pinski
2023-02-18 19:26     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-18 19:31     ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2023-02-18 20:57       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-18 21:07       ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-02-19  1:14         ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2023-02-20  8:11           ` Richard Biener
2023-02-20 13:32             ` Alexander Monakov
2023-02-28 12:54               ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2023-02-18 21:06   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-18 21:30     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-02-18 21:57       ` Jeff Law
2023-02-20  1:27       ` Andrew Waterman
2023-04-28 20:09 ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26ca669c-70ce-e475-717e-3c36f1e1c703@gmail.com \
    --to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).