From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hamza.pair.com (hamza.pair.com [209.68.5.143]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1104385840C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 14:22:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org C1104385840C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pfeifer.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pfeifer.com Received: from hamza.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA1033E89; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:22:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.80] (62-47-135-117.adsl.highway.telekom.at [62.47.135.117]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by hamza.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C8BE33E8D; Wed, 11 Jan 2023 09:22:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2023 15:21:52 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: "Jose E. Marchesi" cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: [PATCH,WWWDOCS] htdocs: news: GCC BPF in Compiler Explorer In-Reply-To: <20221223093357.3170-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> Message-ID: <2712211e-92e4-8530-3fb0-5844f89428dc@pfeifer.com> References: <20221223093357.3170-1-jose.marchesi@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="8323328-1942410747-1673442035=:5651" X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.10 on 209.68.5.143 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1942410747-1673442035=:5651 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, Jose E. Marchesi via Gcc-patches wrote: > This patch adds an entry to the News section in index.html, announcing > the availability of a nightly build of bpf-unknown-none-gcc. Nice! > +
GCC BPF in Compiler Explorer > + [2022-12-23]
> +
Support for a nightly build of the bpf-unknown-none-gcc compiler > + has been contributed to Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) by Marc > + Poulhičs
Usually I recommend active voice, something like "Compiler Explorer (aka godbolt.org) now supports nightly builds of the bpf-unknown-none-gcc compiler thanks to Marc Poulhičs", but your proposal is perfectly fine, too. Which means only change if you like the alternative apprach better yourself; otherwise simply use the existing one. Either way: Okay, and thank you! Gerald --8323328-1942410747-1673442035=:5651--