From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ed1-x533.google.com (mail-ed1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::533]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13EDA3858D3C for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 10:57:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 13EDA3858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ed1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-52683b68c2fso7154791a12.0 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 03:57:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694516237; x=1695121037; darn=gcc.gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1Ymfo0acrS5CY1Jo5EixOzRmrBGdGTbrOnPOrysnaJM=; b=O7P4GVqaeQHPIxOcZHMK7Umls9YGFFIO3WbMEOUGzNWrfed1rumISQbxuf0HBqC4/Q Uq1q59fLeNF3rk4ZXN6yzDBnsb7VhiPFCp8bEWYklrWhRF3GOrggZJLdqyb3YMWNE7Hl MJkTAI8A5BROydLdV4tZ9EUScQG+Hu6m7ysedujZfVc7vxz4CHZnkmRbzoc7+LG97lOZ S04np2eJNoZ4XUVu6Zwmdz8ORBUf2X7gxNmGNu2YsKECoHjJwPs567Q3O1LJiUgaIvhR x+APCyySRHVZNz8FpUggZIa0vRbLNJgTdfM9sLkUAegIb+7F1tz/WnG4plSG5RXnhOii QaAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694516237; x=1695121037; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:cc:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1Ymfo0acrS5CY1Jo5EixOzRmrBGdGTbrOnPOrysnaJM=; b=PYUs8NYUhpMnuJQFsetlKswRPyurXsAvyf+0L9Ny6sQ4/VWvjKlXGCk/NJ7Z463CUK UjYUvygHrE78HpPnHWDiHA8Kobw/g/GFju3sLkrqZPxiY5eM5bAwyMTY1VaXHQIucToH LutnNzxH6q23t2+04PeSXcfWCjKuwIvs2zk8dsSp54giFFIR/hWlDbIRI0dDA6gHYY8r +K99+ld1ykdYQ5aZsyOMh54w4QdgaxX0Cgq1WM4HocBJC7JPf664eT/9aULnMCfbSFGw mh5Vm2x4HoUptJ5isdAGVLCf11BkTM8S2QYGZ2xhtXz4DL/a7q5YZ/ufudoSx1CEkvXL onCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyfNZH2LbdYwQXBN7e4mFztRQvdezlSgsA0cjP1JItk3b/mus+H SzODjQP4Et7PapX/Xy2rGuM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHOIGkdBNVf2jp3o6S2ABG6samee2ZnwApYrGSt5H6b35dDSE96tMhxdUIfgtdd1Gk/eAfBww== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:26c7:b0:52f:a6e4:28c6 with SMTP id x7-20020a05640226c700b0052fa6e428c6mr1137943edd.12.1694516237467; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 03:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.23] (ip-046-005-130-086.um12.pools.vodafone-ip.de. [46.5.130.86]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d32-20020a056402402000b00521d2f7459fsm4213848eda.49.2023.09.12.03.57.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Sep 2023 03:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <276ed9c3-5cdf-eed3-3f44-b1a13b51a00f@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 12:57:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cc: rdapp.gcc@gmail.com, "kito.cheng" , "Kito.cheng" , jeffreyalaw Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] RISC-V: Support Dynamic LMUL Cost model Content-Language: en-US To: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" , gcc-patches References: <20230912064932.647337-1-juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> <6710B99B5C7487DA+2023091217250873108440@rivai.ai> <60C0CC476BFCFF53+2023091217364091739043@rivai.ai> From: Robin Dapp In-Reply-To: <60C0CC476BFCFF53+2023091217364091739043@rivai.ai> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > This is first version of dynamic LMUL. > I didn't test it with full GCC testsuite. > > My plan is to first pass all GCC testsuite (including vect.exp) with default LMUL = M1. > Then enable dynamic LMUL to test it. > > Maybe we could tolerate this ICE issue for now. Then we can test it > with full GCC testsuite (I belive we can reproduce with some case in > GCC testsuite in the future). > > Is that reasonable ? If yes, I will fix all your comments and send V5. Yes, works for me. Regards Robin