public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robin Dapp <rdapp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       "Bin.Cheng" <amker.cheng@gmail.com>,
	       Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5 v3] Vect peeling cost model
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 15:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <279040cf-a300-ee84-d8f3-514d5405ea9a@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFiYyc0aqRzr_tbNVhhX63A88bkknzBdfjM6_rpW6rgDLB1X-g@mail.gmail.com>

The last version of the patch series caused some regressions for ppc64.
This was largely due to incorrect handling of unsupportable alignment
and should be fixed with the new version.

p2 and p5 have not changed but I'm posting the whole series again for
reference.  p1 only changed comment wording, p3 was adapted to apply on
the trunk.

No regressions on s390x, x86-64 and ppc64.  Bootstrapped.

Regards
 Robin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-23 15:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-11 14:38 [RFC] S/390: Alignment peeling prolog generation Robin Dapp
2017-04-11 14:57 ` Bin.Cheng
2017-04-11 15:03   ` Robin Dapp
2017-04-11 15:07     ` Bin.Cheng
2017-04-11 16:25   ` Richard Biener
2017-04-12  7:51     ` Robin Dapp
2017-04-12  7:58       ` Richard Biener
2017-05-04  9:04         ` Robin Dapp
2017-05-05 11:04           ` Richard Biener
2017-05-08 16:12             ` Robin Dapp
2017-05-09 10:38               ` Richard Biener
2017-05-11 11:17                 ` [PATCH 1/5] Vect peeling cost model Robin Dapp
2017-05-11 11:17                 ` [RFC] S/390: Alignment peeling prolog generation Robin Dapp
2017-05-11 12:15                   ` Richard Biener
2017-05-11 12:16                     ` Richard Biener
2017-05-11 12:48                       ` Richard Biener
2017-05-11 11:18                 ` [PATCH 2/5] Vect peeling cost model Robin Dapp
2017-05-11 11:19                 ` [PATCH 3/5] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-11 11:20                 ` [PATCH 4/5] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-11 15:30                   ` [PATCH 4/5 v2] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-12  9:36                     ` Richard Biener
2017-05-23 15:58                       ` [PATCH 1/5 v3] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-23 15:58                       ` Robin Dapp [this message]
2017-05-24  7:51                         ` [PATCH 0/5 " Richard Biener
2017-05-24 11:57                           ` Robin Dapp
2017-05-24 13:56                             ` Richard Biener
2017-06-03 17:12                         ` Andreas Schwab
2017-06-06  7:13                           ` Robin Dapp
2017-06-06 17:26                             ` Andreas Schwab
2017-06-07 10:50                               ` Robin Dapp
2017-06-07 11:43                                 ` Andreas Schwab
2017-05-23 15:58                       ` [PATCH 2/5 " Robin Dapp
2017-05-23 19:25                         ` Richard Sandiford
2017-05-24  7:37                           ` Robin Dapp
2017-05-24  7:53                             ` Richard Sandiford
2017-05-23 15:59                       ` [PATCH 4/5 " Robin Dapp
2017-05-31 13:56                         ` Christophe Lyon
2017-05-31 14:37                           ` Robin Dapp
2017-05-31 14:49                             ` Christophe Lyon
2017-05-23 15:59                       ` [PATCH 5/5 " Robin Dapp
2017-05-23 16:02                       ` [PATCH 3/5 " Robin Dapp
2017-05-11 11:59                 ` [PATCH 5/5] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-08 16:13             ` [PATCH 3/4] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-09 10:41               ` Richard Biener
2017-05-08 16:27             ` [PATCH 4/4] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-09 10:55               ` Richard Biener
2017-05-04  9:04         ` [PATCH 1/3] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-05 10:32           ` Richard Biener
2017-05-04  9:07         ` [PATCH 2/3] " Robin Dapp
2017-05-05 10:37           ` Richard Biener
2017-05-04  9:14         ` [PATCH 3/3] " Robin Dapp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=279040cf-a300-ee84-d8f3-514d5405ea9a@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=rdapp@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=amker.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=krebbel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).