From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70261 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2016 11:54:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70251 invoked by uid 89); 21 Oct 2016 11:54:52 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy= X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:54:51 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D6A7C056800 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.localdomain (vpn1-4-137.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.4.137]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u9LBsm7E002139; Fri, 21 Oct 2016 07:54:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change ranges_table and ranges_by_label arrays into vec<*, va_gc> * To: Jakub Jelinek , Jason Merrill References: <20161020183020.GY7282@tucnak.redhat.com> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org From: Bernd Schmidt Message-ID: <27909e0a-8c5f-c75c-7bc8-ff12bb2d7fd9@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:54:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161020183020.GY7282@tucnak.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg01741.txt.bz2 On 10/20/2016 08:30 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > This patch changes these two manually maintained arrays into normal > vec.h vectors. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? > Looks good. For safety, could you make a before/after comparison on one large sourcefile to make sure code is identical? Bernd