From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd0:100:1062:25:2:0:3]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 458D13858C50; Sun, 14 May 2023 13:04:21 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 458D13858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=netcologne.de Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=netcologne.de Received: from cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de [89.1.8.202]) by cc-smtpout3.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41EE12436; Sun, 14 May 2023 15:04:19 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=netcologne.de; s=nc1116a; t=1684069459; bh=zD6lOLY/Iuipy0cSxtesDkjQudDA5pOO9nQ98Q8lz+o=; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=IKqq/cqi+/taM1bqPSFZKyWSM++D6dgw0MYZfbYqdYT5of4owXGDWsH3hXqKKe114 y7wTvahQjemwjCJu4rjUaNijCiY80DM9cpRevht4uYhih0pi6nHFaIGXuL2sW0uhA8 gt3g9hUlRgs4EeWqUpMqRwD/oGp0ZuO5WFixiT66dDuqtj79mKmEI8lVmQut+5maoR cAyBy/72FudvH066/wPsAS8JdHVISc7uCaaPoP8IJE+kzbE6Uc7D4tM6Io8WUSwoAg Zz4gfdYqt5GUD/RqBia1cNuVHSgL+L+KOVX4eiEmWZeG6OOZ9RFVq+RIDCpyjy8xBq qJB1GsUUdClDA== Received: from [IPV6:2001:4dd6:3fec:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d] (2001-4dd6-3fec-0-7285-c2ff-fe6c-992d.ipv6dyn.netcologne.de [IPv6:2001:4dd6:3fec:0:7285:c2ff:fe6c:992d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by cc-smtpin2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 645F711DBB; Sun, 14 May 2023 15:04:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <284716f0-fe76-dc88-e5be-4af0f65e13f4@netcologne.de> Date: Sun, 14 May 2023 15:04:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Fortran: Narrow return types [PR78798] To: Mikael Morin , Bernhard Reutner-Fischer , fortran@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer References: <8B220543-5633-47CA-8DF9-0381613CBDF3@gmail.com> <20230510164719.155783-1-rep.dot.nop@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Thomas Koenig In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-NetCologne-Spam: L X-Rspamd-Action: no action X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 645F711DBB X-Spamd-Bar: - X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 14.05.23 14:27, Mikael Morin wrote: > > (...) >> @@ -2098,7 +2098,7 @@ ref_same_as_full_array (gfc_ref *full_ref, >> gfc_ref *ref) >>           there is some kind of overlap. >>       0 : array references are identical or not overlapping.  */ >> -int >> +bool >>   gfc_dep_resolver (gfc_ref *lref, gfc_ref *rref, gfc_reverse *reverse, >>             bool identical) >>   { > > The function comment states that the function may return 2, which > doesn't seem to be the case any more. Hm, this makes me a litte suspicious. Was functionality for reversing loops lost, maybe unintentionally? I assume that, at some time, we did use the '2' as return value (or did we?) Best regards Thomas