public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	       Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	       "rguenther@suse.de" <rguenther@suse.de>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimise the fpclassify builtin to perform integer operations when possible
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 16:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29751c79-6a6b-a597-7025-eea32b63ba0f@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160913084133.GE7282@tucnak.redhat.com>

On 09/13/2016 02:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 04:19:32PM +0000, Tamar Christina wrote:
>> This patch adds an optimized route to the fpclassify builtin
>> for floating point numbers which are similar to IEEE-754 in format.
>>
>> The goal is to make it faster by:
>> 1. Trying to determine the most common case first
>>    (e.g. the float is a Normal number) and then the
>>    rest. The amount of code generated at -O2 are
>>    about the same +/- 1 instruction, but the code
>>    is much better.
>> 2. Using integer operation in the optimized path.
>
> Is it generally preferable to use integer operations for this instead
> of floating point operations?  I mean various targets have quite high costs
> of moving data in between the general purpose and floating point register
> file, often it has to go through memory etc.
Bit testing/twiddling is obviously a trade-off for a non-addressable 
object.  I don't think there's any reasonable way to always generate the 
most efficient code as it's going to depend on (for example) register 
allocation behavior.

So what we're stuck doing is relying on the target costing bits to guide 
this kind of thing.

jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-13 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-12 16:21 Tamar Christina
2016-09-12 22:33 ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-13 12:25   ` Tamar Christina
2016-09-12 22:41 ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-13 12:30   ` Tamar Christina
2016-09-13 12:44     ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-15  9:08       ` Tamar Christina
2016-09-15 11:21         ` Wilco Dijkstra
2016-09-15 12:56           ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-15 13:05         ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-12 22:49 ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-13 12:33   ` Tamar Christina
2016-09-13 12:48     ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-13  8:58 ` Jakub Jelinek
2016-09-13 16:16   ` Jeff Law [this message]
2016-09-14  8:31     ` Richard Biener
2016-09-15 16:02       ` Jeff Law
2016-09-15 16:28         ` Richard Biener
2016-09-16 19:53 ` Jeff Law
2016-09-20 12:14   ` Tamar Christina
2016-09-20 14:52     ` Jeff Law
2016-09-20 17:52       ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-21  7:13       ` Richard Biener
2016-09-19 22:43 ` Michael Meissner
     [not found]   ` <41217f33-3861-dbb8-2f11-950ab30a7021@arm.com>
2016-09-20 21:27     ` Michael Meissner
2016-09-21  2:05       ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-21  8:32         ` Richard Biener
2016-09-12 17:24 Moritz Klammler
2016-09-12 20:08 ` Andrew Pinski
2016-09-13 12:16 Wilco Dijkstra
2016-09-13 16:10 ` Joseph Myers
2016-09-21 14:51 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29751c79-6a6b-a597-7025-eea32b63ba0f@redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).