public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: rguenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 richard.sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Support CALL vectorization for COND_LEN_*
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2023 17:52:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2D07CE5FAE4855F2+2023073117523428113212@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2307310915590.12935@jbgna.fhfr.qr>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 16603 bytes --]

Hi, Richard. Thanks a lot for the comment

>> In your code above
>> you either use cond_len_fn or get_len_internal_fn (cond_fn) but
>> isn't that the very same?!  So how come you in one case add two
>> and in the other add four args?

cond_len_fn is not the same as get_len_internal_fn (cond_fn) when vectorizing FMA into COND_LEN_FMA.

since "internal_fn cond_len_fn = get_len_internal_fn (ifn);"

and the iterators:
> +#define FOR_EACH_LEN_FN_PAIR(T)                                                \
> +  T (MASK_LOAD, MASK_LEN_LOAD)                                                 \
> +  T (MASK_STORE, MASK_LEN_STORE)                                               \
> +  T (MASK_GATHER_LOAD, MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD)                                   \
> +  T (MASK_SCATTER_STORE, MASK_LEN_SCATTER_STORE)                               \
> +  T (COND_ADD, COND_LEN_ADD)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_SUB, COND_LEN_SUB)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_MUL, COND_LEN_MUL)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_DIV, COND_LEN_DIV)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_MOD, COND_LEN_MOD)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_RDIV, COND_LEN_RDIV)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_FMIN, COND_LEN_FMIN)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_FMAX, COND_LEN_FMAX)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_MIN, COND_LEN_MIN)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_MAX, COND_LEN_MAX)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_AND, COND_LEN_AND)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_IOR, COND_LEN_IOR)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_XOR, COND_LEN_XOR)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_SHL, COND_LEN_SHL)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_SHR, COND_LEN_SHR)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_NEG, COND_LEN_NEG)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_FMA, COND_LEN_FMA)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_FMS, COND_LEN_FMS)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_FNMA, COND_LEN_FNMA)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_FNMS, COND_LEN_FNMS)

So, cond_len_fn will be IFN_LAST when ifn = FMA.

Maybe is it reasonable that I add 4 more iterators here?
> +  T (FMA, COND_LEN_FMA)                                                   \
> +  T (FMS, COND_LEN_FMS)                                                   \
> +  T (FNMA, COND_LEN_FNMA)                                                 \
> +  T (FNMS, COND_LEN_FNMS)

So that we won't need to have "get_len_internal_fn (cond_fn)"

When vectorizing COND_ADD into COND_LEN_ADD we already have "mask" and "else" value.
So we only need to add 2 arguments.

But when vectorizing FMA into COND_LEN_FMA, we need to add 4 arguments (mask,else,len,bias).

>>as said,
>>no idea why we special case reduc_idx >= 0 at the moment

I also want to vectorize FMA into COND_LEN_FMA even reduc_idx < 0.
Could I relax this condition for COND_LEN_* since it will improve RVV codegen a lot.

Thanks.


juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Richard Biener
Date: 2023-07-31 17:26
To: Juzhe-Zhong
CC: gcc-patches; richard.sandiford
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] VECT: Support CALL vectorization for COND_LEN_*
On Fri, 28 Jul 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
 
> Hi, Richard and Richi.
> 
> Base on the suggestions from Richard:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/625396.html
> 
> This patch choose (1) approach that Richard provided, meaning:
> 
> RVV implements cond_* optabs as expanders.  RVV therefore supports
> both IFN_COND_ADD and IFN_COND_LEN_ADD.  No dummy length arguments
> are needed at the gimple level.
> 
> Such approach can make codes much cleaner and reasonable.
> 
> Consider this following case:
> void foo (float * __restrict a, float * __restrict b, int * __restrict cond, int n)
> {
>   for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
>     if (cond[i])
>       a[i] = b[i] + a[i];
> }
> 
> 
> Output of RISC-V (32-bits) gcc (trunk) (Compiler #3)
> <source>:5:21: missed: couldn't vectorize loop
> <source>:5:21: missed: not vectorized: control flow in loop.
> 
> ARM SVE:
> 
> ...
> mask__27.10_51 = vect__4.9_49 != { 0, ... };
> ...
> vec_mask_and_55 = loop_mask_49 & mask__27.10_51;
> ...
> vect__9.17_62 = .COND_ADD (vec_mask_and_55, vect__6.13_56, vect__8.16_60, vect__6.13_56);
> 
> For RVV, we want IR as follows:
> 
> ...
> _68 = .SELECT_VL (ivtmp_66, POLY_INT_CST [4, 4]);
> ...
> mask__27.10_51 = vect__4.9_49 != { 0, ... };
> ...
> vect__9.17_60 = .COND_LEN_ADD (mask__27.10_51, vect__6.13_55, vect__8.16_59, vect__6.13_55, _68, 0);
> ...
> 
> Both len and mask of COND_LEN_ADD are real not dummy.
> 
> This patch has been fully tested in RISC-V port with supporting both COND_* and COND_LEN_*.
> 
> And also, Bootstrap and Regression on X86 passed.
> 
> OK for trunk?
> 
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> 
>         * internal-fn.cc (FOR_EACH_LEN_FN_PAIR): New macro.
>         (get_len_internal_fn): New function.
>         (CASE): Ditto.
>         * internal-fn.h (get_len_internal_fn): Ditto.
>         * tree-vect-stmts.cc (vectorizable_call): Support CALL vectorization with COND_LEN_*.
> 
> ---
>  gcc/internal-fn.cc     | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  gcc/internal-fn.h      |  1 +
>  gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.cc b/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> index 8e294286388..379220bebc7 100644
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.cc
> @@ -4443,6 +4443,52 @@ get_conditional_internal_fn (internal_fn fn)
>      }
>  }
>  
> +/* Invoke T(IFN) for each internal function IFN that also has an
> +   IFN_COND_LEN_* or IFN_MASK_LEN_* form.  */
> +#define FOR_EACH_LEN_FN_PAIR(T)                                                \
> +  T (MASK_LOAD, MASK_LEN_LOAD)                                                 \
> +  T (MASK_STORE, MASK_LEN_STORE)                                               \
> +  T (MASK_GATHER_LOAD, MASK_LEN_GATHER_LOAD)                                   \
> +  T (MASK_SCATTER_STORE, MASK_LEN_SCATTER_STORE)                               \
> +  T (COND_ADD, COND_LEN_ADD)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_SUB, COND_LEN_SUB)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_MUL, COND_LEN_MUL)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_DIV, COND_LEN_DIV)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_MOD, COND_LEN_MOD)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_RDIV, COND_LEN_RDIV)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_FMIN, COND_LEN_FMIN)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_FMAX, COND_LEN_FMAX)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_MIN, COND_LEN_MIN)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_MAX, COND_LEN_MAX)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_AND, COND_LEN_AND)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_IOR, COND_LEN_IOR)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_XOR, COND_LEN_XOR)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_SHL, COND_LEN_SHL)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_SHR, COND_LEN_SHR)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_NEG, COND_LEN_NEG)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_FMA, COND_LEN_FMA)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_FMS, COND_LEN_FMS)                                                   \
> +  T (COND_FNMA, COND_LEN_FNMA)                                                 \
> +  T (COND_FNMS, COND_LEN_FNMS)
> +
> +/* If there exists an internal function like IFN that operates on vectors,
> +   but with additional length and bias parameters, return the internal_fn
> +   for that function, otherwise return IFN_LAST.  */
> +internal_fn
> +get_len_internal_fn (internal_fn fn)
> +{
> +  switch (fn)
> +    {
> +#define CASE(NAME, LEN_NAME)                                                   \
> +  case IFN_##NAME:                                                             \
> +    return IFN_##LEN_NAME;
> +      FOR_EACH_LEN_FN_PAIR (CASE)
> +#undef CASE
> +    default:
> +      return IFN_LAST;
> +    }
> +}
> +
>  /* If IFN implements the conditional form of an unconditional internal
>     function, return that unconditional function, otherwise return IFN_LAST.  */
>  
> diff --git a/gcc/internal-fn.h b/gcc/internal-fn.h
> index a5c3f4765ff..410c1b623d6 100644
> --- a/gcc/internal-fn.h
> +++ b/gcc/internal-fn.h
> @@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ extern bool set_edom_supported_p (void);
>  
>  extern internal_fn get_conditional_internal_fn (tree_code);
>  extern internal_fn get_conditional_internal_fn (internal_fn);
> +extern internal_fn get_len_internal_fn (internal_fn);
>  extern internal_fn get_conditional_len_internal_fn (tree_code);
>  extern tree_code conditional_internal_fn_code (internal_fn);
>  extern internal_fn get_unconditional_internal_fn (internal_fn);
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> index 6a4e8fce126..ae5b0b09c08 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-stmts.cc
> @@ -3540,7 +3540,10 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
>  
>    int reduc_idx = STMT_VINFO_REDUC_IDX (stmt_info);
>    internal_fn cond_fn = get_conditional_internal_fn (ifn);
> +  internal_fn cond_len_fn = get_len_internal_fn (ifn);
> +  int len_opno = internal_fn_len_index (cond_len_fn);
>    vec_loop_masks *masks = (loop_vinfo ? &LOOP_VINFO_MASKS (loop_vinfo) : NULL);
> +  vec_loop_lens *lens = (loop_vinfo ? &LOOP_VINFO_LENS (loop_vinfo) : NULL);
>    if (!vec_stmt) /* transformation not required.  */
>      {
>        if (slp_node)
> @@ -3586,8 +3589,14 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
 
Above for reduc_idx >= 0 there's a check whether cond_fn is supported,
don't you need to amend that with a check for cond_len_fn?
 
>        tree scalar_mask = NULL_TREE;
>        if (mask_opno >= 0)
>  scalar_mask = gimple_call_arg (stmt_info->stmt, mask_opno);
> -       vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo, masks, nvectors,
> -      vectype_out, scalar_mask);
> +       if (cond_len_fn != IFN_LAST
> +   && direct_internal_fn_supported_p (cond_len_fn, vectype_out,
> +      OPTIMIZE_FOR_SPEED))
> + vect_record_loop_len (loop_vinfo, lens, nvectors, vectype_out,
> +       1);
> +       else
> + vect_record_loop_mask (loop_vinfo, masks, nvectors, vectype_out,
> +        scalar_mask);
>      }
>  }
>        return true;
> @@ -3603,8 +3612,24 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
>    vec_dest = vect_create_destination_var (scalar_dest, vectype_out);
>  
>    bool masked_loop_p = loop_vinfo && LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_MASKED_P (loop_vinfo);
> +  bool len_loop_p = loop_vinfo && LOOP_VINFO_FULLY_WITH_LENGTH_P (loop_vinfo);
>    unsigned int vect_nargs = nargs;
> -  if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
> +  if (len_loop_p)
> +    {
> +      if (len_opno >= 0)
> + {
> +   ifn = cond_len_fn;
> +   /* COND_* -> COND_LEN_* takes 2 extra arguments:LEN,BIAS.  */
> +   vect_nargs += 2;
> + }
> +      else if (reduc_idx >= 0)
> + {
> +   /* FMA -> COND_LEN_FMA takes 4 extra arguments:MASK,ELSE,LEN,BIAS.  */
> +   ifn = get_len_internal_fn (cond_fn);
> +   vect_nargs += 4;
 
I'm a bit confused (but also by the existing mask code), whether
vect_nargs needs adjustment depends on the IFN in the IL we analyze.
If if-conversion recognizes a .COND_ADD then we need to add nothing
for masking (that is, ifn == cond_fn already).  In your code above
you either use cond_len_fn or get_len_internal_fn (cond_fn) but
isn't that the very same?!  So how come you in one case add two
and in the other add four args?
 
Please make sure to place gcc_unreachable () in each arm and check
you have test coverage.  I believe that the else arm is unreachable
but when you vectorize .FMA you will need to add 4 and when you
vectorize .COND_FMA you will need to add two arguments (as said,
no idea why we special case reduc_idx >= 0 at the moment).
 
Otherwise the patch looks OK to me.
 
Thanks,
Richard.
 
> + }
> +    }
> +  else if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
>      {
>        ifn = cond_fn;
>        vect_nargs += 2;
> @@ -3629,7 +3654,18 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
>        FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (vec_oprnds0, i, vec_oprnd0)
>  {
>    int varg = 0;
> -   if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
> +   if (len_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
> +     {
> +       /* Always true for SLP.  */
> +       gcc_assert (ncopies == 1);
> +       /* For COND_LEN_* operations used by reduction of
> + CALL vectorization, the LEN argument is the real
> + loop len produced by SELECT_VL or MIN wheras the
> + MASK argument here is the dummy mask.  */
> +       vargs[varg++]
> + = build_minus_one_cst (truth_type_for (vectype_out));
> +     }
> +   else if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
>      {
>        unsigned int vec_num = vec_oprnds0.length ();
>        /* Always true for SLP.  */
> @@ -3644,7 +3680,7 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
>        vec<tree> vec_oprndsk = vec_defs[k];
>        vargs[varg++] = vec_oprndsk[i];
>      }
> -   if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
> +   if ((masked_loop_p || len_loop_p) && reduc_idx >= 0)
>      vargs[varg++] = vargs[reduc_idx + 1];
>    gimple *new_stmt;
>    if (modifier == NARROW)
> @@ -3671,7 +3707,21 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
>      }
>    else
>      {
> -       if (mask_opno >= 0 && masked_loop_p)
> +       if (len_opno >= 0 && len_loop_p)
> + {
> +   unsigned int vec_num = vec_oprnds0.length ();
> +   /* Always true for SLP.  */
> +   gcc_assert (ncopies == 1);
> +   tree len
> +     = vect_get_loop_len (loop_vinfo, gsi, lens, vec_num,
> + vectype_out, i, 1);
> +   signed char biasval
> +     = LOOP_VINFO_PARTIAL_LOAD_STORE_BIAS (loop_vinfo);
> +   tree bias = build_int_cst (intQI_type_node, biasval);
> +   vargs[len_opno] = len;
> +   vargs[len_opno + 1] = bias;
> + }
> +       else if (mask_opno >= 0 && masked_loop_p)
>  {
>    unsigned int vec_num = vec_oprnds0.length ();
>    /* Always true for SLP.  */
> @@ -3701,7 +3751,16 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
>      }
>  
>    int varg = 0;
> -   if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
> +   if (len_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
> +     {
> +       /* For COND_LEN_* operations used by reduction of
> + CALL vectorization, the LEN argument is the real
> + loop len produced by SELECT_VL or MIN wheras the
> + MASK argument here is the dummy mask.  */
> +       vargs[varg++]
> + = build_minus_one_cst (truth_type_for (vectype_out));
> +     }
> +   else if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
>      vargs[varg++] = vect_get_loop_mask (loop_vinfo, gsi, masks, ncopies,
>  vectype_out, j);
>    for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++)
> @@ -3716,10 +3775,20 @@ vectorizable_call (vec_info *vinfo,
>  }
>        vargs[varg++] = vec_defs[i][j];
>      }
> -   if (masked_loop_p && reduc_idx >= 0)
> +   if ((masked_loop_p || len_loop_p) && reduc_idx >= 0)
>      vargs[varg++] = vargs[reduc_idx + 1];
>  
> -   if (mask_opno >= 0 && masked_loop_p)
> +   if (len_opno >= 0 && len_loop_p)
> +     {
> +       tree len = vect_get_loop_len (loop_vinfo, gsi, lens, ncopies,
> +     vectype_out, j, 1);
> +       signed char biasval
> + = LOOP_VINFO_PARTIAL_LOAD_STORE_BIAS (loop_vinfo);
> +       tree bias = build_int_cst (intQI_type_node, biasval);
> +       vargs[len_opno] = len;
> +       vargs[len_opno + 1] = bias;
> +     }
> +   else if (mask_opno >= 0 && masked_loop_p)
>      {
>        tree mask = vect_get_loop_mask (loop_vinfo, gsi, masks, ncopies,
>        vectype_out, j);
> 
 
-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-31  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-28  7:10 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-07-31  9:26 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-31  9:52   ` juzhe.zhong [this message]
2023-07-31 10:45     ` Richard Biener
2023-07-31 10:59       ` juzhe.zhong
2023-07-31 10:19 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-07-31 11:52   ` juzhe.zhong
2023-07-31 12:00     ` Richard Biener
2023-07-31 12:09       ` juzhe.zhong
2023-07-31 13:33         ` Richard Biener
2023-07-31 13:43           ` 钟居哲
2023-07-31 13:58             ` Richard Biener
2023-07-31 14:29               ` 钟居哲
2023-08-02  7:49                 ` Richard Biener
2023-08-02  8:29                   ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-02  8:33                     ` Richard Biener
2023-08-02  8:46                       ` juzhe.zhong
2023-08-03  2:38                       ` juzhe.zhong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2D07CE5FAE4855F2+2023073117523428113212@rivai.ai \
    --to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).