From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-406961-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 123662 invoked by alias); 9 Sep 2015 14:47:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123646 invoked by uid 89); 9 Sep 2015 14:47:51 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: resqmta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net
Received: from resqmta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.168) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:47:51 +0000
Received: from resomta-po-14v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.238])	by resqmta-po-09v.sys.comcast.net with comcast	id F2nQ1r00358ss0Y012npio; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:47:49 +0000
Received: from [IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d] ([IPv6:2001:558:6045:a4:40c6:7199:cd03:b02d])	by resomta-po-14v.sys.comcast.net with comcast	id F2nl1r00W2ztT3H012nnQD; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:47:48 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Convert SPARC to LRA
From: Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150908.214115.1585933992134500164.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:48:00 -0000
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@libertysurf.fr>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2D64499C-B66A-4873-BDB9-C6190FF539FE@comcast.net>
References: <20150908.214115.1585933992134500164.davem@davemloft.net>
To: Vladimir Makarov <vmakarov@redhat.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2

On Sep 8, 2015, at 9:41 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> +#define TARGET_LRA_P hook_bool_void_true

Are we at the point there this should be the default, and old ports should =
just define to false, if they really need to?  I=92m using nothing but LRA =
as well.