public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Hayward <Alan.Hayward@arm.com>
To: Kilian Verhetsel <kilian.verhetsel@uclouvain.be>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	GCC Patches	<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix result for conditional reductions matching at index 0
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 10:30:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2E74E2B4-E89F-4B6E-95DB-8733A912AF2C@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wp2ib6aj.fsf@uclouvain.be>


> On 22 Nov 2017, at 16:57, Kilian Verhetsel <kilian.verhetsel@uclouvain.be> wrote:
> 
> 
> Thank you both for your comments.
> 
> I have added the check to ensure the index vector won't cause an
> overflow. I also added tests to the testsuite in order to check that the
> loop is vectorized for UINT_MAX - 1 iterations but not UINT_MAX
> iterations. I was not able to write code that triggers
> INTEGER_INDUC_COND_REDUCTION when using char or other smaller types
> (changing the types of last, min_v and a to something else causes
> COND_REDUCTION to be used instead), so these tests are only compiled and
> not executed.

I had similar problems when playing around with -14.c, but didn’t have chance to
investigate why. Possibly worth raising a bug to mentioning there is a missed
optimisation. It’d be nice to figure out why.

> 
> I also moved an instruction that generates a vector of zeroes (used for
> COND_REDUCTION) in the branch of code run only for COND_REDUCTION, this
> should remove the unused vector that Alan noticed.

Patch is ok for me.


Alan.


  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-23  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-21 11:41 Kilian Verhetsel
2017-11-21 14:06 ` Richard Biener
2017-11-21 16:49   ` Kilian Verhetsel
2017-11-21 17:09     ` Alan Hayward
2017-11-22  9:17     ` Richard Biener
2017-11-22 11:15       ` Alan Hayward
2017-11-22 15:07         ` Richard Biener
2017-11-22 17:23           ` Kilian Verhetsel
2017-11-23 10:30             ` Alan Hayward [this message]
2017-11-23 12:39               ` Richard Biener
2017-12-08 18:15             ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-12-11 10:57               ` Kilian Verhetsel
2017-12-11 13:11                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-12-11 13:51                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-12-11 17:00                     ` Kilian Verhetsel
2017-12-11 17:06                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2017-12-11 21:22                       ` [PATCH] Fix result for conditional reductions matching at index 0 (PR tree-optimization/80631) Jakub Jelinek
2017-12-12  7:57                         ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2E74E2B4-E89F-4B6E-95DB-8733A912AF2C@arm.com \
    --to=alan.hayward@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=kilian.verhetsel@uclouvain.be \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).