From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5330 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2016 18:00:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5048 invoked by uid 89); 15 Mar 2016 18:00:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=vta, VTA, fvta, fvtatoggle X-HELO: mail.ispras.ru Received: from mail.ispras.ru (HELO mail.ispras.ru) (83.149.199.45) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:00:20 +0000 Received: from [10.10.3.52] (pluton2.ispras.ru [83.149.199.44]) by mail.ispras.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E1F9554006D; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:00:17 +0300 (MSK) Subject: Re: [02/05] Fix PR 63384 To: Alexander Monakov , Marek Polacek References: <693a88a9-8878-b169-2bcf-f35e3b52c859@ispras.ru> <20160315173031.GF10006@redhat.com> Cc: GCC Patches From: Andrey Belevantsev Message-ID: <2a1d2382-e8f1-d62f-952b-6518f558f28c@ispras.ru> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 18:00:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-03/txt/msg00853.txt.bz2 On 15.03.2016 20:44, Alexander Monakov wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2016, Marek Polacek wrote: >> This test fails for me due to >> cc1plus: warning: var-tracking-assignments changes selective scheduling > > Thanks for the heads-up Marek, and sorry for the trouble. Like I said in the > adjacent reply, the warning is expected (I didn't realize the testsuite would > notice that, though). I think the right fix is to simply add "-w" to > dg-options, and while we are at it, we should probably change -fvta-toggle to > just -fvta as well (because VTA is active either way, right?). Yes, the -fvta should work. Sorry for the breakage, I guess I've misread the compare-tests output when also checking the run with forced sel-sched enabled. I can take care of the test tomorrow morning or you can do it now. Best, Andrey > > Andrey? > > Thanks. > Alexander >