From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] range-op: Handle op?.undefined_p () in op[12]_range of comparisons [PR108647]
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 21:29:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2a23c60c-c8ef-a1fd-e7d3-c2ee63f35338@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y91Zmsx+2oWM4Wvs@tucnak>
LGTM
On 2/3/23 19:59, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, we ICE because lhs is singleton [0, 0]
> or [1, 1] but op2 (or in other cases op1) is undefined and op?.*_bound ()
> ICEs on those because there are no pairs for UNDEFINED.
>
> The following patch makes us set r to varying or return false in those
> cases.
>
> Included is a version of the patch I've bootstrapped/regtested successfully
> on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, attached is a slight modification more
> consistent with the range-op-float.cc patch.
>
> Ok for trunk (and which one)?
>
> 2023-02-03 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR tree-optimization/108647
> * range-op.cc (operator_equal::op1_range,
> operator_not_equal::op1_range): Don't test op2 bound
> equality if op2.undefined_p (), instead set_varying.
> (operator_lt::op1_range, operator_le::op1_range,
> operator_gt::op1_range, operator_ge::op1_range): Return false if
> op2.undefined_p ().
> (operator_lt::op2_range, operator_le::op2_range,
> operator_gt::op2_range, operator_ge::op2_range): Return false if
> op1.undefined_p ().
>
> * g++.dg/torture/pr108647.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/range-op.cc.jj 2023-02-03 10:51:40.699003658 +0100
> +++ gcc/range-op.cc 2023-02-03 17:26:02.204429931 +0100
> @@ -642,7 +642,8 @@ operator_equal::op1_range (irange &r, tr
> case BRS_FALSE:
> // If the result is false, the only time we know anything is
> // if OP2 is a constant.
> - if (wi::eq_p (op2.lower_bound(), op2.upper_bound()))
> + if (!op2.undefined_p ()
> + && wi::eq_p (op2.lower_bound(), op2.upper_bound()))
> {
> r = op2;
> r.invert ();
> @@ -755,7 +756,8 @@ operator_not_equal::op1_range (irange &r
> case BRS_TRUE:
> // If the result is true, the only time we know anything is if
> // OP2 is a constant.
> - if (wi::eq_p (op2.lower_bound(), op2.upper_bound()))
> + if (!op2.undefined_p ()
> + && wi::eq_p (op2.lower_bound(), op2.upper_bound()))
> {
> r = op2;
> r.invert ();
> @@ -920,6 +922,9 @@ operator_lt::op1_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &op2,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op2.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> @@ -942,6 +947,9 @@ operator_lt::op2_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &op1,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op1.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> @@ -1031,6 +1039,9 @@ operator_le::op1_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &op2,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op2.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> @@ -1053,6 +1064,9 @@ operator_le::op2_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &op1,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op1.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> @@ -1141,6 +1155,9 @@ operator_gt::op1_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &lhs, const irange &op2,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op2.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> @@ -1163,6 +1180,9 @@ operator_gt::op2_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &op1,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op1.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> @@ -1252,6 +1272,9 @@ operator_ge::op1_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &op2,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op2.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> @@ -1274,6 +1297,9 @@ operator_ge::op2_range (irange &r, tree
> const irange &op1,
> relation_trio) const
> {
> + if (op1.undefined_p ())
> + return false;
> +
> switch (get_bool_state (r, lhs, type))
> {
> case BRS_TRUE:
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr108647.C.jj 2023-02-03 16:36:18.347255058 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr108647.C 2023-02-03 16:32:16.338811259 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
> +// PR tree-optimization/108647
> +// { dg-do compile }
> +
> +bool a;
> +int b, c;
> +
> +inline const bool &
> +foo (bool &e, const bool &f)
> +{
> + return f < e ? f : e;
> +}
> +
> +void
> +bar (signed char e, bool *f, bool *h, bool *g)
> +{
> + for (;;)
> + if (g)
> + for (signed char j = 0; j < 6;
> + j += ((f[0] & c ? g[0] : int(0 >= e))
> + ? 0 : foo (g[0], g[0] > h[0]) + 1))
> + {
> + a = 0;
> + b = 0;
> + }
> +}
>
> Jakub
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-03 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-03 18:59 Jakub Jelinek
2023-02-03 20:29 ` Aldy Hernandez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2a23c60c-c8ef-a1fd-e7d3-c2ee63f35338@redhat.com \
--to=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).