Re: [0/3] Fix PR78120, in ifcvt/rtlanal/i386.

[Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 357 bytes --]

Note that I misspelled the PR number in the 0/3 message :-/

On 11/23/2016 07:57 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> 1. I noticed comparisons between set_src_cost and set_rtx_cost seemed to
> be invalid. There seems to be no good reason that insn_rtx_cost
> shouldn't use the latter. It also makes the numbers comparable to the
> ones you get from seq_cost.


Bernd

[-- Attachment #2: 71280-1.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 480 bytes --]

	PR rtl-optimization/78120
	* rtlanal.c (insn_rtx_cost): Use set_rtx_cost.

Index: gcc/rtlanal.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/rtlanal.c	(revision 242038)
+++ gcc/rtlanal.c	(working copy)
@@ -5211,7 +5211,7 @@ insn_rtx_cost (rtx pat, bool speed)
   else
     return 0;
 
-  cost = set_src_cost (SET_SRC (set), GET_MODE (SET_DEST (set)), speed);
+  cost = set_rtx_cost (set, speed);
   return cost > 0 ? cost : COSTS_N_INSNS (1);
 }