From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ex01.ufhost.com (ex01.ufhost.com [61.152.239.75]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 401AF3858CD1 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 01:47:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 401AF3858CD1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=starfivetech.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=starfivetech.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 401AF3858CD1 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=61.152.239.75 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1703123282; cv=none; b=qbXEFPRmjwD13a5Mr+MLzYLDgs0wxzx+gnCVLa9JcTA8zvY4FJTtHTChudSCPiInO0MBm9Z3uXxKaGKS0COFNWiT1BrangqTLkeVM5+4JuvpFsMgLshRDmOyJmiNp9WVhiHXQKcZ2Maes80/5M/c8MH7REL9oShYgBy6rCeuyCs= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1703123282; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZkD+EznT9m3lp5ydCGi4F5GfhvZ0vtY0DhXPJdv+iT8=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=FgceXJDdVefSxNIm/Kc5rujZDEoI1i0USjNvx9qgyqRHgbWLMBFBUUWA0sy8wiuku6qUieDHtSpfFjKMWaB5Kr0rB3T8sXStlfui9zzrZZmtjqlzvqCEp4/vNKcwWYrGT6Iug8tAD0f4zMbNyww3a/Q4sJ+lu7xGyMD6LsGKHI0= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from EXMBX166.cuchost.com (unknown [175.102.18.54]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "EXMBX166", Issuer "EXMBX166" (not verified)) by ex01.ufhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD3F24E280; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:47:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) by EXMBX166.cuchost.com (172.16.6.76) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:47:45 +0800 Received: from [192.168.50.3] (113.72.145.47) by EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.42; Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:47:45 +0800 Message-ID: <2c593804-1dd8-4ae4-a5d2-048561537ce8@starfivetech.com> Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:47:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix calculation of max live vregs Content-Language: en-US To: Jeff Law , "juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai" , gcc-patches CC: pan2.li References: <20231220081537.2013818-1-demin.han@starfivetech.com> <94537595-39cb-4bc0-824e-97b47cfc25c6@starfivetech.com> <1f44e02c-fffe-4150-86d0-c0e696ae0ec8@gmail.com> From: Demin Han In-Reply-To: <1f44e02c-fffe-4150-86d0-c0e696ae0ec8@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [113.72.145.47] X-ClientProxiedBy: EXCAS063.cuchost.com (172.16.6.23) To EXMBX168.cuchost.com (172.16.6.78) X-YovoleRuleAgent: yovoleflag X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Jeff, Thanks for reminding this. Regression test info will be added to commit log in following patches. Demin On 2023/12/20 23:28, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 12/20/23 04:17, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote: >> I see. LGTM. Thanks for explanation. >> >> I will ask Li Pan commit it for you. > The patch from Demin didn't specify if it had been regression tested. > > All patches must be regression tested and an indication that the test passed and on what target must be included in the patch email thread. > > Please don't ACK patches that haven't followed this policy. It's OK with conditions like "OK after verifying this patch doesn't cause regressions in the testsuite on rv64gc" or something similar. > > jeff