From: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Simplify fold_single_bit_test with respect to code
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 22:52:35 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2c5a1abd-f798-70f7-90d7-78943ccb94af@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230520021451.1901275-6-apinski@marvell.com>
On 5/19/23 20:14, Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Since we know that fold_single_bit_test is now only passed
> NE_EXPR or EQ_EXPR, we can simplify it and just use a gcc_assert
> to assert that is the code that is being passed.
>
> OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * expr.cc (fold_single_bit_test): Add an assert
> and simplify based on code being NE_EXPR or EQ_EXPR.
OK.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-20 4:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-20 2:14 [PATCH 0/7] Improve do_store_flag Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 2:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] Move fold_single_bit_test to expr.cc from fold-const.cc Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 4:43 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-20 2:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] Inline and simplify fold_single_bit_test_into_sign_test into fold_single_bit_test Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 4:47 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-20 4:48 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-20 2:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] Use get_def_for_expr in fold_single_bit_test Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 4:49 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-20 2:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] Simplify fold_single_bit_test slightly Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 4:51 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-20 2:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] Simplify fold_single_bit_test with respect to code Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 4:52 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2023-05-20 2:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] Use BIT_FIELD_REF inside fold_single_bit_test Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 4:54 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-20 2:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] Expand directly for single bit test Andrew Pinski
2023-05-20 4:55 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2c5a1abd-f798-70f7-90d7-78943ccb94af@gmail.com \
--to=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=apinski@marvell.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).