public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [committed] PR testsuite/86540, twiddle for aarch64
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2018 15:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ccb1968-2c73-1b8f-f995-dedcee929477@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b009164a-fad5-7719-0da5-e8f3398db540@arm.com>

On 12/7/18 6:46 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 15:36, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> As outlined in the PR, the aarch64 has a non-default value for
>> CASE_VALUES_THRESHOLD which changes decisions in switch lowering.  Those
>> changes in switch lowering can expose additional jump threads later in
>> the pipeline which cause heartburn for a couple tests.
>>
>> I looked at all the other ports with a non-default value of
>> CASE_VALUES_THRESHOLD and only aarch64 is high enough to trigger these
>> changes in behavior on the two relevant tests.  So I'm just skipping the
>> tests that run after switch lowering on aarch64.
>>
>> Verified with a cross that these tests now pass.
>>
>> Committing to the trunk,
>>
> 
> Can't we use a param to force the value back to (near) the default?
> That would then work even if other targets start changing the default here.
That would have been my preference, but I didn't see a suitable PARAM
and adding one just for these two tests seemed like overkill.

jeff

      reply	other threads:[~2018-12-07 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-06 15:36 Jeff Law
2018-12-07 13:46 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2018-12-07 15:06   ` Jeff Law [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ccb1968-2c73-1b8f-f995-dedcee929477@redhat.com \
    --to=law@redhat.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).