From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79FB83858D20; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:35:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 79FB83858D20 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 79FB83858D20 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.156.1 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714296903; cv=none; b=c3Ug1zma9FdbzTGfm9rlcWQtdDqdFzShr3jiJYTrZJ50avOtFhvwlyxQcrCU83mvcYhVCoDUWCxT4CozuPewrosDvxUeSQTynshhJ7NxT2JT/sQOnZ61uAZdpw0F5nXTDlKTFI+zDDcEXCdMSS9pdP4XE0z3dLmgikwXoTpZ1mM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1714296903; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pxV8TEpQC67tTOIY+TlOSccMuylYwDAjwOrChENl3Gc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; b=rhT1coNdhNpyNAqY60Nytpzl4XYKeSlUjE/DEpw20VsvXiKCCnj8MEsL4qIjPGMrjAHL/0oH84KBhEb3fyZRATfxtIepfF9/eLAQY5jMgHmZ8Uwz7eyYNeYYwMD9NCAw9hudzZSF+o5jb1kazutt0VXoHpBzKPXMXTGeNd5f4Lk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from pps.filterd (m0353727.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 43S9UIkr012492; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:56 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : date : mime-version : subject : to : cc : references : from : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=Yg/wVXUQXBo7I376qCKhjvT5AlVWGO9jG7F1SJpOJsk=; b=Q+gL8bRSt0bvccYupSyWC1u+SgLKb/zPfbcuhuWxXhNnR+Aao0M9uo+PMaw1QmPKdQYf iLHGfn8JC0heagEmyjdVU3amVRArpMSos0muxeApkPj5Kq3q8Ve/liUdmoxlHvVVC1C7 PW4hLNIsAjntx83DZG1EvS0pGs24lreVAV7P20qHjaOYodnsOKHuPEaVt5beDS6Ynebi eKGm4HuwFI7iF/LfBm4D4h8V/iAdy1PXIlNMiooXkZC6qnRtMpaOYtvfeQogsNekXExu Rs4a5EnnfJXtF1PRLVdXHxMG7lRGgvXJjdqiJOYObtpDJB8naZK0bFD/QjvPcnW1MIQL Jw== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xskfjr0xb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:56 +0000 Received: from m0353727.ppops.net (m0353727.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 43S9YuHO020503; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:56 GMT Received: from ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5b.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.91]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xskfjr0x6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:56 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.17.1.19/8.17.1.19) with ESMTP id 43S6256M003184; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:54 GMT Received: from smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com ([9.218.2.228]) by ppma21.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3xscpp1k83-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:54 +0000 Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com [10.20.54.103]) by smtprelay04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 43S9Yowc11207088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:52 GMT Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F9320040; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FC820043; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.200.48.19] (unknown [9.200.48.19]) by smtpav04.fra02v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 09:34:47 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <2da63b96-5fc6-71cb-40e9-d2728edcd7fb@linux.ibm.com> Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:34:46 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc: testsuite: pr79004 needs -mlong-double-128 Content-Language: en-US To: Alexandre Oliva Cc: Rainer Orth , Mike Stump , David Edelsohn , Kewen Lin , Segher Boessenkool , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20210412210424.GK26583@gate.crashing.org> <6f1df02a-c133-6297-b785-b05d135ca165@linux.ibm.com> From: "Kewen.Lin" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-GUID: fFJSxndNNWOsVkHOWSKHyIRQJIipFB9U X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: kQYBk1Vhm6VniC5YbKbwUwE2hFc6Aw0H X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1011,Hydra:6.0.650,FMLib:17.11.176.26 definitions=2024-04-28_06,2024-04-26_02,2023-05-22_02 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2404010000 definitions=main-2404280066 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,GIT_PATCH_0,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi, on 2024/4/28 16:20, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > On Apr 23, 2024, "Kewen.Lin" wrote: > >> This patch seemed to miss to CC gcc-patches list. :) > > Oops, sorry, thanks for catching that. > > Here it is. FTR, you've already responded suggesting an apparent > preference for addressing PR105359, but since I meant to contribute it, > I'm reposting is to gcc-patches, now with a reference to the PR. OK, from this perspective IMHO it seems more clear to adopt xfail with effective target long_double_64bit? BR, Kewen > > > ppc: testsuite: pr79004 needs -mlong-double-128 > > Some of the asm opcodes expected by pr79004 depend on > -mlong-double-128 to be output. E.g., without this flag, the > conditions of patterns @extenddf2 and extendsf2 do not > hold, and so GCC resorts to libcalls instead of even trying > rs6000_expand_float128_convert. > > Perhaps the conditions are too strict, and they could enable the use > of conversion insns involving __ieee128/_Float128 even with 64-bit > long doubles. Alas, for now, we need this flag for the test to pass > on target variants that use 64-bit long doubles. > > > for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > * gcc.target/powerpr/pr79004.c: Add -mlong-double-128. > --- > gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr79004.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr79004.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr79004.c > index e411702dc98a9..061a0e83fe2ad 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr79004.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr79004.c > @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ > /* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* && lp64 } } } */ > /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */ > -/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -O2 -mfloat128" } */ > +/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9 -O2 -mfloat128 -mlong-double-128" } */ > /* { dg-prune-output ".-mfloat128. option may not be fully supported" } */ > > #include > >