public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Andre Vieira (lists)" <andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com>
To: "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "jakub@redhat.com" <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Subject: [RFC 6/X] omp: Allow creation of simd clones from omp declare variant with -fopenmp-simd flag
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 16:28:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f1139f6-5ac6-6baa-3190-99b09d35b9b9@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e2ca63fc-ca0b-a5c1-3b44-f82d913cf21f@arm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]

Hi,

This RFC is to propose relaxing the flag needed to allow the creation of 
simd clones from omp declare variants, such that we can use 
-fopenmp-simd rather than -fopenmp.
This should only change the behaviour of omp simd clones and should not 
enable any other openmp functionality, though I need to test this 
furter, for the time being I just played around a bit with some of the 
existing declare-variant tests.

Any objections to this in general? And/or ideas to properly test the 
effect of this on other omp codegen? My current plan is to have a look 
at the declare-variant tests we had before this patch series, locally 
modify them to pass -fopenmp-simd and make sure they fail the same way 
before and after this patch.

[-- Attachment #2: libmvec_6.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4223 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/c/c-parser.cc b/gcc/c/c-parser.cc
index 21bc3167ce224823c214efc064be399f2da9c787..b28e3d0a8adb520941dc3a17173cc07de4a653c5 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/c/c-parser.cc
@@ -23564,6 +23564,13 @@ c_parser_omp_declare (c_parser *parser, enum pragma_context context)
 	  c_parser_omp_declare_reduction (parser, context);
 	  return false;
 	}
+      if (strcmp (p, "variant") == 0)
+	{
+	  /* c_parser_consume_token (parser); done in
+	     c_parser_omp_declare_simd.  */
+	  c_parser_omp_declare_simd (parser, context);
+	  return true;
+	}
       if (!flag_openmp)  /* flag_openmp_simd  */
 	{
 	  c_parser_skip_to_pragma_eol (parser, false);
@@ -23575,13 +23582,6 @@ c_parser_omp_declare (c_parser *parser, enum pragma_context context)
 	  c_parser_omp_declare_target (parser);
 	  return false;
 	}
-      if (strcmp (p, "variant") == 0)
-	{
-	  /* c_parser_consume_token (parser); done in
-	     c_parser_omp_declare_simd.  */
-	  c_parser_omp_declare_simd (parser, context);
-	  return true;
-	}
     }
 
   c_parser_error (parser, "expected %<simd%>, %<reduction%>, "
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 1aa5f1a7898df9483a2af4f6f9fea99e6b219271..7bd32fd3e345a003be03d1e9acf33db76eed9460 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -8428,7 +8428,7 @@ cp_finish_decl (tree decl, tree init, bool init_const_expr_p,
 	suppress_warning (decl, OPT_Winit_self);
     }
 
-  if (flag_openmp
+  if (flag_openmp_simd
       && TREE_CODE (decl) == FUNCTION_DECL
       /* #pragma omp declare variant on methods handled in finish_struct
 	 instead.  */
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index 1a124f5395e018f3c4b2f9f36fcd42159d0b868f..d1c7f9d91d2546ad8f5674232a05f7d7726eeafe 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -47884,7 +47884,7 @@ cp_parser_omp_declare (cp_parser *parser, cp_token *pragma_tok,
 				      context, false);
 	  return true;
 	}
-      if (flag_openmp && strcmp (p, "variant") == 0)
+      if (strcmp (p, "variant") == 0)
 	{
 	  cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer);
 	  cp_parser_omp_declare_simd (parser, pragma_tok,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/declare-variant-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/declare-variant-1.c
index c44c9464f4e27047db9be5b0c9710ae3cfee8eee..83eeadd108b5578623c63e73dea11b2b17a08618 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/declare-variant-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/declare-variant-1.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp-simd" } */
 
 #include "declare-variant-1.x"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-1.c
index 7a8129fe88ac9759b2337892a3d14f4e8196e61f..616b0ed1c1dc019103dae504d2cec65523a35a3d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-1.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp-simd" } */
 
 #include "../declare-variant-1.x"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-2.c
index 2b6eabac76cf1cd059ec8d960ddd9e30973dc797..a832c5255306999b0006b68b1890c7f42c3dafb0 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-2.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-2.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp -msve-vector-bits=128" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp-simd -msve-vector-bits=128" } */
 
 #include "../declare-variant-1.x"
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-3.c
index e8b598fe479d7e1e92eb7f9e3413d5ac183626a9..455c0338d4680d143daae666c29e4f018df5bff9 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-3.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/sve/declare-variant-3.c
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 /* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp -msve-vector-bits=256" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3 -fopenmp-simd -msve-vector-bits=256" } */
 
 #include "../declare-variant-1.x"
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-08 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-08 16:17 [RFC 0/X] Implement GCC support for AArch64 libmvec Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-03-08 16:20 ` [PATCH 1/X] omp: Replace simd_clone_subparts with TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-04-20 15:20   ` Richard Sandiford
2023-03-08 16:21 ` [PATCH 2/X] parloops: Copy target and optimizations when creating a function clone Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-03-08 16:23 ` [PATCH 3/X] parloops: Allow poly number of iterations Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-03-08 16:25 ` [RFC 4/X] omp, aarch64: Add SVE support for 'omp declare simd' [PR 96342] Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-03-08 16:26 ` [RFC 5/X] omp: Create simd clones from 'omp declare variant's Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-03-08 16:28 ` Andre Vieira (lists) [this message]
2023-04-20 14:51 ` [RFC 0/X] Implement GCC support for AArch64 libmvec Richard Sandiford
2023-04-20 15:22   ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-04-20 16:02     ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-20 16:13     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-21  9:28       ` Andre Vieira (lists)
2023-04-21  9:54         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-21 10:28           ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2f1139f6-5ac6-6baa-3190-99b09d35b9b9@arm.com \
    --to=andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).