v2: Change macro definition following internal discussion. __ARM_NEON_SVE_BRIDGE was missed in the original patch and is added by this patch. Ok for trunk and a backport into gcc-14? gcc/ChangeLog: * config/aarch64/aarch64-c.cc (aarch64_define_unconditional_macros): Add missing __ARM_NEON_SVE_BRIDGE. On 6/6/24 13:20, Richard Sandiford wrote: > Richard Ball writes: >> __ARM_NEON_SVE_BRIDGE was missed in the original patch and is >> added by this patch. >> >> Ok for trunk and a backport into gcc-14? >> >> gcc/ChangeLog: >> >> * config/aarch64/aarch64-c.cc (aarch64_update_cpp_builtins): >> Add missing __ARM_NEON_SVE_BRIDGE. > > After this patch was posted, there was some internal discussion > involving LLVM & GNU devs about what this kind of macro means, now that > we have FMV. The feeling was that __ARM_NEON_SVE_BRIDGE should just > indicate whether the compiler provides the file, not whether AdvSIMD > & SVE are enabled. I think we should therefore add this to > aarch64_define_unconditional_macros instead. > > Sorry for the slow review. I was waiting for the outcome of that > discussion before replying. > > Thanks, > Richard > >> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-c.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-c.cc >> index fe1a20e4e546a68e5f7eddff3bbb0d3e831fbd9b..1121be118cf8d05e3736ad4ee75568ff7cb92bfd 100644 >> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-c.cc >> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-c.cc >> @@ -260,6 +260,7 @@ aarch64_update_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *pfile) >> aarch64_def_or_undef (TARGET_SME_I16I64, "__ARM_FEATURE_SME_I16I64", pfile); >> aarch64_def_or_undef (TARGET_SME_F64F64, "__ARM_FEATURE_SME_F64F64", pfile); >> aarch64_def_or_undef (TARGET_SME2, "__ARM_FEATURE_SME2", pfile); >> + aarch64_def_or_undef (TARGET_SVE, "__ARM_NEON_SVE_BRIDGE", pfile); >> >> /* Not for ACLE, but required to keep "float.h" correct if we switch >> target between implementations that do or do not support ARMv8.2-A