From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90684 invoked by alias); 19 Sep 2019 16:40:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 90676 invoked by uid 89); 19 Sep 2019 16:40:20 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 spammy=olivier, idsandoe@googlemail.com, D*googlemail.com, idsandoegooglemailcom X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:40:19 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0658081395; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 18:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0jL0GSwnB4S1; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 18:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.14] (bny92-4-82-228-126-192.fbx.proxad.net [82.228.126.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BA4281385; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 18:40:16 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: [Ada] Fix 32/64bit mistake on SYSTEM_INFO component in s-win32 From: Olivier Hainque In-Reply-To: <54C6899E-E8CA-464E-93A9-F45E284E8B29@googlemail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 16:40:00 -0000 Cc: Rainer Orth , Pierre-Marie de Rodat , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <302E3795-445D-48F8-82A8-0A645D2D21E4@adacore.com> References: <20190918083944.GA145030@adacore.com> <54C6899E-E8CA-464E-93A9-F45E284E8B29@googlemail.com> To: Iain Sandoe X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg01204.txt.bz2 Hello Iain & Rainer, Thanks for the heads up and sorry for the disruption from this one. > On 19 Sep 2019, at 17:02, Iain Sandoe wrote: > >> Given that the test cannot compile on anything but *-*-linux* and >> *-*-mingw*, I'd rather restrict the test to those two (or more targets >> that decide to implement the missing interface). > > that makes sense, too (targets with support can opt in) Works for me as well. The point of the test is really to check a 32/64 discrepancy initially observed on Windows. It is not meant as a general representative test of the System.Task_Info feature. If you get it to work on Darwin or Solaris and wish to opt-in afterwards, this is also fine of course :) We can take care of adding the required filter. Cheers, Olivier