From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-239508-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23474 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2009 15:08:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 23426 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2009 15:08:04 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SARE_MSGID_LONG40,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (HELO mail-bw0-f224.google.com) (209.85.218.224)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:07:57 +0000
Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so2278237bwz.8         for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.111.211 with SMTP id t19mr1969619fap.64.1240844874359;  	Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:07:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904271641150.29566@wotan.suse.de>
References: <303e1d290904270711s4c3d9ec3k5c0307bd99b9c90@mail.gmail.com> 	 <Pine.LNX.4.64.0904271641150.29566@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:11:00 -0000
Message-ID: <303e1d290904270807g2dc51773y79d7f5b3e5a92d2a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] expand from SSA form (1/2)
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg02118.txt.bz2

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
>> A function in cgraphunit.c is being mis-compiled, probably
>> build_cdtor(). =A0This causes cgraph_build_static_cdtor() to be called
>> with an invalid priority of "-1", instead of 65535. =A0The priority shou=
ld
>> not be negative. =A0This negative priority value generates an invalid
>> global file function name:
>> ...
>> Both Darwin and AIX are bootstrapping in 32 bit mode. =A0Richi suggested
>> on IRC that this may be related to some known CONST_INT issue for
>> which you already have a patch.
>
> This confusion with the numbers seems indeed related to PR39922. =A0If you
> can test the below patch on powerpc that would be nice. =A0I know that it
> fixes the PR on i686-linux where something similar happens.

A quick test of the patch does not fix the failure on AIX.  I will try
a complete bootstrap in case
the bug was causing other miscompilations.

David