Re: [PATCH v2] Destroy arguments for _Cilk_spawn calling in the child (PR 80038)

[Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>]

On 05/02/2017 01:56 AM, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> On 2017-05-02 09:16 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> 
>> This could be related to --enable-checking=release:
>>
>> In file included from ../../gcc/c-family/c-common.h:26:0,
>>                   from ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c:28:
>> ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c: In function 'bool cilk_set_spawn_marker(location_t, tree)':
>> ../../gcc/tree.h:901:42: error: 'tree_check2' was not declared in this scope
>>                   CALL_EXPR, AGGR_INIT_EXPR)->base.u.bits.unsigned_flag)
>>                                            ^
>> ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c:113:9: note: in expansion of macro 'EXPR_CILK_SPAWN'
>>           EXPR_CILK_SPAWN (fcall) = 1;
>>           ^
>> ../../gcc/tree.h:901:42: error: 'tree_check2' was not declared in this scope
>>                   CALL_EXPR, AGGR_INIT_EXPR)->base.u.bits.unsigned_flag)
>>                                            ^
>> ../../gcc/c-family/cilk.c:115:9: note: in expansion of macro 'EXPR_CILK_SPAWN'
>>           EXPR_CILK_SPAWN (TREE_OPERAND (fcall, 1)) = 1;
>>           ^
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
> 
> Sorry T_T.  I've made a stupid mistake in tree.h.
> 
> Let's apply following patch, and alert the RM when backporting r247446.
> 
> 2017-05-02 Xi Ruoyao <ryxi@stu.xidian.edu.cn>
> 
> 	* tree.h (EXPR_CILK_SPAWN): Use macro TREE_CHECK2 instead of
> 	function tree_check2.
THanks.  Installed.

jeff