From: Jeff Law <law@redhat.com>
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: Reorganise machmode.h headers
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:43:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <319770d3-c529-8f86-8cf8-f52b90dcfce0@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874m37s7vf.fsf@e105548-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 11/16/2016 09:32 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> Later patches will make machmode.h rely on wide-int.h and the
> new poly-int.h, so it needs to appear later in the coretypes.h
> include list.
>
> Previously machmode.h included insn-modes.h, which as well as
> the main mode enum contains configuration information like
> MAX_BITSIZE_MODE_ANY_INT. This still needs to come first,
> since files like wide-int.h depend on the configuration
> information.
>
> Similarly, later patches will make the auto-generated inline
> mode size functions use poly-int.h, so the patch splits them
> out into their own header file and includes it after the
> integer utilities.
>
> The patch also makes the generator files include machmode.h
> via coretypes.h. Previously they did it by more indirect means.
>
> Finally, the patch makes wide-int-print.h available via coretypes.h
> too. There didn't seem to be any reason to force only the print
> routines to be included directly, and it would be painful to extend
> that approach to the new polynomial integer classes.
>
> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu and x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>
> [ This patch is part of the SVE series posted here:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-11/msg00030.html ]
>
> gcc/
> 2016-11-16 Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
> Alan Hayward <alan.hayward@arm.com>
> David Sherwood <david.sherwood@arm.com>
>
> * Makefile.in (MACHMODE_H): Remove insn-modes.h
> (CORETYPES_H): New define.
> (MOSTLYCLEANFILES): Add insn-modes-inline.h.
> (insn-modes-inline.h, s-modes-inline-h): New rules.
> (generated_files): Add insn-modes-inline.h.
> (RTL_BASE_H, TREE_CORE_H): Use CORETYPES_H instead of coretypes.h.
> (build/gensupport.o, build/print-rtl.o, build/read-md.o): Likewise.
> (build/read-rtl.o, build/rtl.o, build/vec.o, build/hash-table.o)
> (build/inchash.o, build/gencondmd.o, build/genattr.o): Likewise.
> (build/genattr-common.o, build/genattrtab.o, build/genautomata.o)
> (build/gencheck.o, build/gencodes.o, build/genconditions.o): Likewise.
> (build/genconfig.o, build/genconstants.o, build/genemit.o): Likewise.
> (build/genenums.o, build/genextract.o, build/genflags.o): Likewise.
> (build/gentarget-def.o, build/genmddeps.o, build/genopinit.o)
> (build/genoutput.o, build/genpeep.o, build/genpreds.o): Likewise.
> (build/genrecog.o, build/genmddump.o, build/genmatch.o): Likewise.
> (build/gencfn-macros.o, build/gcov-iov.o): Likewise.
> * coretypes.h: Include everything up to real.h for generators.
> Include insn-modes.h first. Include wide-int-print.h after
> wide-int.h. Include insn-modes-inline.h and then machmode.h.
> * machmode.h: Don't include insn-modes.h here.
> * function-tests.c: Remove includes of signop.h, machmode.h,
> double-int.h and wide-int.h.
> * rtl.h: Likewise.
> * gcc-rich-location.c: Remove includes of machmode.h, double-int.h
> and wide-int.h.
> * optc-save-gen.awk: Likewise.
> * gencheck.c (BITS_PER_UNIT): Delete dummy definition.
> * godump.c: Remove include of wide-int-print.h.
> * pretty-print.h: Likewise.
> * wide-int-print.cc: Likewise.
> * wide-int.cc: Likewise.
> * hash-map-tests.c: Remove include of signop.h.
> * hash-set-tests.c: Likewise.
> * rtl-tests.c: Likewise.
> * mkconfig.sh: Remove include of machmode.h.
> * genmodes.c (emit_insn_modes_h): Split emission of inline functions
> into...
> (emit_insn_modes_inline_h): ...this new function. Emit the code
> into an insn-modes-inline.h header file, adding appropriate
> include guards and end comments.
> (emit_insn_modes_c_header): Remove include of machmode.h.
> (emit_min_insn_modes_c_header): Include coretypes.h rather than
> machmode.h.
> (main): Handle -i flag and call emit_insn_modes_inline_h when
> it is passed.
So I don't see anything here particularly problematical. My question is
whether or not there's anything significant to be gained to moving
forward with this kit, assuming the 67 piece kit is not likely to move
forward.
I do think you'll need some tweaks to the contrib/header-tools which
know about the core headers and dependencies. Hopefully what's in there
is easy enough to figure out how to twiddle appropriately.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-19 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-16 16:32 Richard Sandiford
2016-12-20 0:43 ` Jeff Law [this message]
2016-12-22 16:19 ` Richard Sandiford
2017-05-24 15:08 ` Richard Sandiford
2017-06-12 6:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2017-06-22 11:34 ` Richard Sandiford
2017-06-29 22:39 ` Jeff Law
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=319770d3-c529-8f86-8cf8-f52b90dcfce0@redhat.com \
--to=law@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).