public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Schmidt <bschmidt@redhat.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: fwprop fix for PR79405
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 19:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <328a765e-5466-9740-d545-c1a620805ef9@redhat.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 604 bytes --]

We have two registers being assigned to each other:

  (set (reg 213) (reg 209))
  (set (reg 209) (reg 213))

These being the only definitions, we are happy to forward propagate reg 
209 for reg 213 into a third insn, making a new use for reg 209. We are 
then happy to forward propagate reg 213 for it in the same insn... 
ending up in an infinite loop.

I don't really see an elegant way to prevent this, so the following just 
tries to detect the situation (and more general ones) by brute force. 
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux, verified that the test passes 
with a ppc cross, ok?


Bernd


[-- Attachment #2: 79405.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2785 bytes --]

	PR rtl-optimization/79405
	* fwprop.c (forward_propagate_into): Detect potentially cyclic
	replacements and bail out for them.

	PR rtl-optimization/79405
	* gcc.dg/torture/pr79405.c: New test.

Index: gcc/fwprop.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/fwprop.c	(revision 244815)
+++ gcc/fwprop.c	(working copy)
@@ -1374,13 +1374,42 @@ forward_propagate_into (df_ref use)
 
   /* Only consider uses that have a single definition.  */
   def = get_def_for_use (use);
-  if (!def)
+  if (!def || DF_REF_INSN_INFO (def) == NULL)
     return false;
   if (DF_REF_FLAGS (def) & DF_REF_READ_WRITE)
     return false;
   if (DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (def))
     return false;
 
+  df_ref tmp_def = def;
+  /* There is a problematic case where a chain of assignments
+       rA = rB; rB = rC; .... ; rM = rN; rN = rA.
+     can cause us to replace these registers in an infinite cycle.
+     Walk backwards until we can guarantee that this situation is
+     not present.  */
+  for (;;)
+    {
+      rtx_insn *insn = DF_REF_INSN (tmp_def);
+      rtx set = single_set (insn);
+      if (set == NULL_RTX)
+	break;
+      rtx src = SET_SRC (set);
+      rtx dst = SET_DEST (set);
+      if (GET_CODE (src) != REG || GET_CODE (dst) != REG)
+	break;
+      if (rtx_equal_p (src, DF_REF_REG (use)))
+	return false;
+      df_ref tmp_use = df_single_use (DF_REF_INSN_INFO (tmp_def));
+      if (!tmp_use)
+	break;
+      tmp_def = get_def_for_use (tmp_use);
+      if (!tmp_def || DF_REF_INSN_INFO (tmp_def) == NULL)
+	break;
+      if (DF_REF_FLAGS (tmp_def) & DF_REF_READ_WRITE)
+	break;
+      if (DF_REF_IS_ARTIFICIAL (tmp_def))
+	break;
+    }
   /* Do not propagate loop invariant definitions inside the loop.  */
   if (DF_REF_BB (def)->loop_father != DF_REF_BB (use)->loop_father)
     return false;
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr79405.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr79405.c	(nonexistent)
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr79405.c	(working copy)
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+char cz;
+long long int xx, u2;
+
+void
+qv (int js, int wl)
+{
+  if (js != 0)
+    {
+      short int sc;
+      int *at = (int *)&sc;
+      long long int gx = 0;
+
+      for (;;)
+        {
+          *at = 0;
+          js /= sc;
+
+          for (wl = 0; wl < 2; ++wl)
+            {
+              xx = gx;
+              u2 %= xx > 0;
+              cz /= u2;
+
+ fa:
+              if (cz != u2)
+                {
+                  gx |= js;
+                  cz = gx / js;
+                }
+            }
+        }
+
+ yq:
+      wl /= 0x80000000;
+      u2 = wl;
+      u2 |= (wl != 0) | (wl != 0 && gx != 0);
+      js = u2;
+      goto fa;
+    }
+  goto yq;
+}

             reply	other threads:[~2017-02-16 19:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-16 19:44 Bernd Schmidt [this message]
2017-02-17  9:11 ` Richard Biener
2017-02-17  9:21   ` Richard Biener
2017-02-20 14:02     ` Bernd Schmidt
2017-02-20 17:15       ` Richard Biener
2017-02-22 17:54 ` Jeff Law
2017-02-23  9:02   ` Richard Biener
2017-02-23 22:21     ` Jeff Law
2017-02-24 10:08       ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=328a765e-5466-9740-d545-c1a620805ef9@redhat.com \
    --to=bschmidt@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).