From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.220.28]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33FE93858402 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:27:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 33FE93858402 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.cz Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5147C21982; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:27:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1636727226; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Esb0H4nzMgA1l7K6+FtQ1ncQURm4tYwXDazPn3WZZiM=; b=LQME5vlzk1fhDOgmhF4eFZAZk4tC+6XYhSBeK71azCsmhFEEZi99LlRYrSys1ZzxIl0iaN GhBzH8GSRt7C4ifpRKwK5HOA0ur92KQJrZGTp1AWqDO1RI/2d/fEwTYODAccGN86rH7k7E Em25FMdecqjDIxABGg4K6XfEnz11xd4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1636727226; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Esb0H4nzMgA1l7K6+FtQ1ncQURm4tYwXDazPn3WZZiM=; b=fmfpmaSr5CgAFz6lEbwAc7UO+ce+LYVaEHXdg0PSvte9IkzySIbUmV2wJ4j0Q36CWueVmT tXnJWIepIByihQCg== Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3273613C7C; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id HOP5Cbp5jmHzQQAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:27:06 +0000 Message-ID: <3376e0dd-9f8e-ebac-eaef-4f02865807c3@suse.cz> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 15:27:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code. Content-Language: en-US To: Jeff Law , Jakub Jelinek , hjl.tools@gmail.com Cc: Tobias Burnus , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <499b9ae2-1365-a954-ed5e-35aede5d0def@suse.cz> <20211108085918.GH2710@tucnak> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:27:09 -0000 On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote: >>> This fixes issue reported in the PR. >>> >>> Ready to be installed? >> I'm not sure.  liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the right >> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, nothing >> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed away >> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel fix it in >> their source and update from that. >> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream. > I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the case that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code. > > jeff @H.J. ? Martin