From: David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com>
To: Antoni Boucher <bouanto@zoho.com>
Cc: Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>,
Antoni Boucher via Jit <jit@gcc.gnu.org>,
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgccjit: add some reflection functions in the jit C api
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 17:30:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3388bb8c84e68cd7b0698dc154e7a5666c0d2cde.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201103221324.xw3jbvrw2uwdc4rz@bouanto-desktop.localdomain>
On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 17:13 -0500, Antoni Boucher wrote:
> I was missing a check in gcc_jit_struct_get_field, I added it in this
> new patch.
>
Sorry about the long delay in reviewing this patch.
The main high-level points are:
- currently the get_*_count functions return "ssize_t" - why? Only
unsigned values are meaningful; shouldn't they return "size_t" instead?
- the various "lookup by index" functions take "int" i.e. signed, but
only >= 0 is meaningful. I think it makes sense to make them take
size_t instead.
Sorry if we covered that before in the review, it's been a while.
Various nitpicks inline below...
[...snip...]
> diff --git a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst
> index 6bfa101ed71..236e5c72d81 100644
> --- a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst
> +++ b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst
> @@ -226,3 +226,44 @@ entrypoints:
> --------------------
> ``LIBGCCJIT_ABI_14`` covers the addition of
> :func:`gcc_jit_global_set_initializer`
> +
> +.. _LIBGCCJIT_ABI_15:
> +
> +``LIBGCCJIT_ABI_15``
> +--------------------
> +``LIBGCCJIT_ABI_15`` covers the addition of reflection functions via API
> +entrypoints:
This needs updating, as I used LIBGCCJIT_ABI_15 for inline asm.
[...snip...]
> diff --git a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/functions.rst b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/functions.rst
> index eb40d64010e..aa6de87282d 100644
> --- a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/functions.rst
> +++ b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/functions.rst
> @@ -171,6 +171,16 @@ Functions
> underlying string, so it is valid to pass in a pointer to an on-stack
> buffer.
>
> +.. function:: ssize_t \
> + gcc_jit_function_get_param_count (gcc_jit_function *func)
> +
> + Get the number of parameters of the function.
> +
> +.. function:: gcc_jit_type \*
> + gcc_jit_function_get_return_type (gcc_jit_function *func)
> +
> + Get the return type of the function.
As noted before, this doesn't yet document all the new entrypoints; I
think you wanted to hold off until all the details were thrashed out,
but hopefully we're close.
The documentation for an entrypoint should specify which ABI it was
added in.
[...snip...]
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::type::is_struct method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +gcc_jit_struct *
> +gcc_jit_type_is_struct (gcc_jit_type *type)
> +{
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (type, NULL, NULL, "NULL type");
> + gcc::jit::recording::struct_ *struct_type = type->is_struct ();
> + return (gcc_jit_struct *)struct_type;
> +}
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::vector_type::get_num_units method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +ssize_t
> +gcc_jit_vector_type_get_num_units (gcc_jit_vector_type *vector_type)
> +{
> + RETURN_VAL_IF_FAIL (vector_type, -1, NULL, NULL, "NULL vector_type");
> + return vector_type->get_num_units ();
> +}
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::vector_type::get_element_type method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +gcc_jit_type *
> +gcc_jit_vector_type_get_element_type (gcc_jit_vector_type *vector_type)
> +{
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (vector_type, NULL, NULL, "NULL vector_type");
> + return (gcc_jit_type *)vector_type->get_element_type ();
> +}
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::type::unqualified method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +gcc_jit_type *
> +gcc_jit_type_unqualified (gcc_jit_type *type)
> +{
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (type, NULL, NULL, "NULL type");
> +
> + return (gcc_jit_type *)type->unqualified ();
> +}
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::type::dyn_cast_function_type method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +gcc_jit_function_type *
> +gcc_jit_type_is_function_ptr_type (gcc_jit_type *type)
> +{
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (type, NULL, NULL, "NULL type");
> + gcc::jit::recording::type *func_ptr_type = type->dereference ();
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (func_ptr_type, NULL, NULL, "NULL type");
> + gcc::jit::recording::function_type *func_type =
> + func_ptr_type->dyn_cast_function_type ();
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (func_type, NULL, NULL, "NULL type");
I notice that the other new "*_is_*" functions don't fail if the
dyncast returns NULL, whereas this one does.
RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL calls jit_error; do we really want that? It seems
more consistent to have it return NULL without an error for the case
where "type" isn't a function ptr type.
> +
> + return (gcc_jit_function_type *)func_type;
> +}
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::function_type::get_return_type method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +gcc_jit_type *
> +gcc_jit_function_type_get_return_type (gcc_jit_function_type *function_type)
> +{
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (function_type, NULL, NULL, "NULL struct_type");
Wrong error message; should be "NULL function_type".
> + return (gcc_jit_type *)function_type->get_return_type ();
> +}
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::function_type::get_param_types method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +ssize_t
> +gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_count (gcc_jit_function_type *function_type)
> +{
> + RETURN_VAL_IF_FAIL (function_type, -1, NULL, NULL, "NULL struct_type");
Wrong error message; should be "NULL function_type".
> + return function_type->get_param_types ().length ();
> +}
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::function_type::get_param_types method, in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +
> +gcc_jit_type *
> +gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_type (gcc_jit_function_type *function_type,
> + int index)
> +{
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (function_type, NULL, NULL, "NULL struct_type");
Wrong error message; should be "NULL function_type".
> + int num_params = function_type->get_param_types ().length ();
> + gcc::jit::recording::context *ctxt = function_type->m_ctxt;
"index" should either be unsigned, or we need to check here for >= 0.
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL_PRINTF3 (index < num_params,
> + ctxt, NULL,
> + "index of %d is too large (%s has %d params)",
> + index,
> + function_type->get_debug_string (),
> + num_params);
> + return (gcc_jit_type *)function_type->get_param_types ()[index];
> +}
> +
> /* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
>
> After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> @@ -731,6 +930,36 @@ gcc_jit_struct_set_fields (gcc_jit_struct *struct_type,
> (gcc::jit::recording::field **)fields);
> }
>
> +
> +/* Public entrypoint. See description in libgccjit.h.
> +
> + After error-checking, the real work is done by the
> + gcc::jit::recording::fields::get_field method in
> + jit-recording.c. */
> +extern gcc_jit_field *
> +gcc_jit_struct_get_field (gcc_jit_struct *struct_type,
> + int index)
> +{
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (struct_type, NULL, NULL, "NULL struct type");
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (struct_type->get_fields (), NULL, NULL, "NULL struct fields");
"index" should either be unsigned, or we need to check here for >= 0.
> + RETURN_NULL_IF_FAIL (index < struct_type->get_fields ()->length (), NULL,
> + NULL, "NULL struct type");
> + return (gcc_jit_field *)struct_type->get_fields ()->get_field (index);
> +}
[...snip...]
> diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h
> index 7134841bb07..db4ccffb41c 100644
> --- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h
> +++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,12 @@ typedef struct gcc_jit_field gcc_jit_field;
> the layout for, or an opaque type. */
> typedef struct gcc_jit_struct gcc_jit_struct;
>
> +/* A gcc_jit_function_type encapsulates a function type. */
> +typedef struct gcc_jit_function_type gcc_jit_function_type;
> +
> +/* A gcc_jit_vector_type encapsulates a vector type. */
> +typedef struct gcc_jit_vector_type gcc_jit_vector_type;
> +
Please add these to the ASCII art inheritance diagram immediately
above:
typedef struct gcc_jit_object gcc_jit_object;
[...snip...]
> /* Unions work similarly to structs. */
> extern gcc_jit_type *
> gcc_jit_context_new_union_type (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
> @@ -1518,6 +1533,78 @@ gcc_jit_version_minor (void);
> extern int
> gcc_jit_version_patchlevel (void);
>
> +#define LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_REFLECTION
> +
> +/* Reflection functions to get the number of parameters, return type of
> + a function and whether a type is a bool from the C API.
> +
> + This API entrypoint was added in LIBGCCJIT_ABI_15; you can test for its
> + presence using
> + #ifdef LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_REFLECTION
> +*/
> +/* Get the return type of a function. */
> +extern gcc_jit_type *
> +gcc_jit_function_get_return_type (gcc_jit_function *func);
> +
> +/* Get the number of params of a function. */
> +extern ssize_t
> +gcc_jit_function_get_param_count (gcc_jit_function *func);
You're using ssize_t here, why? Wouldn't size_t be better?
The count can't be negative.
Should we use size_t for indexes, rather than "int"?
(this happens in various places e.g.
gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_count and
gcc_jit_vector_type_get_num_units)
[...snip...]
> diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map
> index a6e67e781a4..720b6ca286f 100644
> --- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map
> +++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map
> @@ -192,3 +192,24 @@ LIBGCCJIT_ABI_14 {
> global:
> gcc_jit_global_set_initializer;
> } LIBGCCJIT_ABI_13;
> +
> +LIBGCCJIT_ABI_15 {
> + global:
> + gcc_jit_function_get_return_type;
> + gcc_jit_function_get_param_count;
> + gcc_jit_function_type_get_return_type;
> + gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_count;
> + gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_type;
> + gcc_jit_type_unqualified;
> + gcc_jit_type_is_array;
> + gcc_jit_type_is_bool;
> + gcc_jit_type_is_function_ptr_type;
> + gcc_jit_type_is_integral;
> + gcc_jit_type_is_pointer;
> + gcc_jit_type_is_vector;
> + gcc_jit_vector_type_get_element_type;
> + gcc_jit_vector_type_get_num_units;
> + gcc_jit_struct_get_field;
> + gcc_jit_type_is_struct;
> + gcc_jit_struct_get_field_count;
> +} LIBGCCJIT_ABI_14;
As noted above, this will need to be LIBGCCJIT_ABI_16 as I used
LIBGCCJIT_ABI_15 for inline asm.
[...snip...]
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-reflection.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-reflection.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..b3cf2942f3a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-reflection.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +#include <stdlib.h>
> +#include <stdio.h>
> +
> +#include "libgccjit.h"
> +
> +#include "harness.h"
> +
> +void
> +create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
> +{
> + /* Do nothing. */
> +}
> +
> +void
> +verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
> +{
> + /* Get the built-in functions. */
> + gcc_jit_function *builtin_sin =
> + gcc_jit_context_get_builtin_function (ctxt, "sin");
> +
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_function_get_param_count(builtin_sin), 1);
> +
> + gcc_jit_type *double_type =
> + gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_DOUBLE);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_function_get_return_type(builtin_sin), double_type);
> + CHECK (!gcc_jit_type_is_integral(double_type));
> +
> + gcc_jit_type *bool_type =
> + gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_BOOL);
> + CHECK (gcc_jit_type_is_bool(bool_type));
> + CHECK (!gcc_jit_type_is_integral(bool_type));
> +
> + gcc_jit_type *aligned_bool_type =
> + gcc_jit_type_get_aligned(gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_BOOL), 8);
> + CHECK (gcc_jit_type_is_bool(aligned_bool_type));
> + CHECK (bool_type != aligned_bool_type);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_type_unqualified(aligned_bool_type), bool_type);
> +
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_type_unqualified(gcc_jit_type_get_const(bool_type)), bool_type);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_type_unqualified(gcc_jit_type_get_volatile(bool_type)), bool_type);
> +
> + gcc_jit_type *int64 =
> + gcc_jit_context_get_int_type(ctxt, 8, 1);
> + CHECK (gcc_jit_type_is_integral(int64));
> + gcc_jit_type *uint64 =
> + gcc_jit_context_get_int_type(ctxt, 8, 0);
> + CHECK (gcc_jit_type_is_integral(uint64));
> + gcc_jit_type *int8 =
> + gcc_jit_context_get_int_type(ctxt, 1, 1);
> + CHECK (gcc_jit_type_is_integral(int8));
> + gcc_jit_type *uint8 =
> + gcc_jit_context_get_int_type(ctxt, 1, 0);
> + CHECK (gcc_jit_type_is_integral(uint8));
> +
> + CHECK (!gcc_jit_type_is_vector(double_type));
> + gcc_jit_type *vec_type = gcc_jit_type_get_vector (double_type, 4);
> + gcc_jit_vector_type *vector_type = gcc_jit_type_is_vector(vec_type);
> + CHECK (vector_type);
> + CHECK (vec_type != double_type);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_vector_type_get_element_type(vector_type), double_type);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_vector_type_get_num_units(vector_type), 4);
> +
> + CHECK (!gcc_jit_type_is_pointer(double_type));
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_type_is_pointer(gcc_jit_type_get_pointer(double_type)), double_type);
> +
> + gcc_jit_type* params[2] = {int8, uint64};
> + gcc_jit_type *function_ptr_type = gcc_jit_context_new_function_ptr_type(ctxt, NULL, int64, 2, params, 0);
> + gcc_jit_function_type *function_type = gcc_jit_type_is_function_ptr_type (function_ptr_type);
> + CHECK (function_type);
> + int param_count = gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_count(function_type);
> + CHECK_VALUE (param_count, 2);
> + gcc_jit_type *return_type = gcc_jit_function_type_get_return_type(function_type);
> + CHECK_VALUE (return_type, int64);
> + gcc_jit_type *param1 = gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_type(function_type, 0);
> + CHECK_VALUE (param1, int8);
> + gcc_jit_type *param2 = gcc_jit_function_type_get_param_type(function_type, 1);
> + CHECK_VALUE (param2, uint64);
> +
> + gcc_jit_field *field1 = gcc_jit_context_new_field (ctxt, NULL, uint64, "field1");
> + gcc_jit_field *field2 = gcc_jit_context_new_field (ctxt, NULL, double_type, "field2");
> + gcc_jit_field *fields[2] = { field1, field2 };
> + gcc_jit_struct *struct_type = gcc_jit_context_new_struct_type (ctxt, NULL, "testStruct", 2, fields);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_struct_get_field_count(struct_type), 2);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_struct_get_field(struct_type, 0), field1);
> + CHECK_VALUE (gcc_jit_struct_get_field(struct_type, 1), field2);
> + gcc_jit_struct *struct_ty = gcc_jit_type_is_struct(gcc_jit_struct_as_type(struct_type));
> + CHECK_VALUE (struct_ty, struct_type);
I think this is missing test coverage for the various gcc_jit_type_is_*
entrypoints gracefully returning NULL when the type passed to them is
wrong (e.g. a non-struct type passed to gcc_jit_type_is_struct, etc)
Hope this is constructive; sorry again about the delay in reviewing it.
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-13 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 1:01 Antoni Boucher
2020-10-02 20:17 ` David Malcolm
2020-10-02 20:24 ` David Malcolm
2020-10-02 22:39 ` [PATCH] libgccjit: add some reflection functions in the jit C api [PR96889] Antoni Boucher
2020-10-03 18:14 ` [PATCH] libgccjit: add some reflection functions in the jit C api [WIP] Antoni Boucher
2020-10-15 16:02 ` [PATCH] libgccjit: add some reflection functions in the jit C api Antoni Boucher
2020-10-15 16:23 ` Andrea Corallo
2020-10-15 17:39 ` Antoni Boucher
2020-10-15 18:04 ` Andrea Corallo
2020-10-15 21:52 ` David Malcolm
2020-10-17 0:41 ` Antoni Boucher
2020-11-03 22:13 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-05-13 8:33 ` Martin Liška
2021-05-13 21:30 ` David Malcolm [this message]
2021-05-14 2:11 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-05-26 0:19 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-05-27 22:19 ` David Malcolm
2021-05-28 1:51 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-06-10 22:41 ` David Malcolm
[not found] ` <bc9e81dc3f0a68d6389c9765b5901a5dbd1dcd71.camel@zoho.com>
[not found] ` <e962387aff72bce1ea29b0fc2cb04b84c26f9855.camel@redhat.com>
2021-06-18 15:55 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-06-18 16:09 ` David Malcolm
2021-06-18 19:41 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-06-18 20:37 ` David Malcolm
2021-07-19 16:10 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-07-29 12:59 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-08-31 12:34 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-09-28 0:53 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-10-13 2:09 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-10-23 21:08 ` SV: " Petter Tomner
2021-11-14 21:30 ` Antoni Boucher
2021-11-20 0:53 ` David Malcolm
2021-11-26 18:03 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2021-11-26 19:51 ` Gerald Pfeifer
[not found] ` <91ecd9dd299e4d61903b2995d8c64a09@kth.se>
2021-12-02 18:04 ` Gerald Pfeifer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3388bb8c84e68cd7b0698dc154e7a5666c0d2cde.camel@redhat.com \
--to=dmalcolm@redhat.com \
--cc=andrea.corallo@arm.com \
--cc=bouanto@zoho.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jit@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).