From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 71333 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2016 17:42:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70328 invoked by uid 89); 18 Nov 2016 17:42:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:626 X-HELO: resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net Received: from resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net (HELO resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net) (96.114.154.167) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:42:29 +0000 Received: from resomta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.236]) by resqmta-po-08v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 7nAtc9idu2dNj7nBDcxkrT; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:42:28 +0000 Received: from up.mrs.kithrup.com ([24.4.193.248]) by resomta-po-12v.sys.comcast.net with SMTP id 7nBCcCp0e3n367nBDc54rr; Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:42:27 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [fixincludes] Fix macOS 10.12 and (PR sanitizer/78267) From: Mike Stump In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:42:00 -0000 Cc: Bruce Korb , GCC Patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <338ADAEA-837C-4935-9222-DDB94363D3F2@comcast.net> References: <5D0F34A7-12A8-4DEC-915A-4BE37CFD76A1@comcast.net> To: Rainer Orth X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCm775JafeVyZ2v1zkV+3ujW8a13ALPPE8pSyQClxZtifa++VsjA3Z+zR3VhdkKTUtqIDxZT55DkzKWM4EY7+4ek0Cgb7AWs9VE1a/Zq+PoMVo01CXY9 BUJ6X2r+7XJRYEdnpphRWXUjCk3Otw+TGBAGCcova8G3etOs3BACyOvq17UJ8da31pVsaCgNivplJYmSXgDAz/ePlu9susN4zGXLrkZKQycZ5tqdPeJM05/4 idpcZHA0986ne9p/hNdd4A== X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01979.txt.bz2 On Nov 18, 2016, at 2:45 AM, Rainer Orth wrot= e: > So the current suggestion is to combine my fixincludes patch and Jack's > patch to disable use if !__BLOCKS__. > I guess this is ok for mainline now to restore bootstrap? I think we are down to everyone likes this, Ok. The big question is, does = this need a back port? If you fix includes virtual members or data members of C/C++ classes, just = be careful disappearing content as that can change the layout of the struct= ure or class.