From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 127158 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2015 11:22:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 127140 invoked by uid 89); 15 Oct 2015 11:22:16 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: smtp.eu.adacore.com Received: from mel.act-europe.fr (HELO smtp.eu.adacore.com) (194.98.77.210) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:22:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3325A27B32DC; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:22:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.eu.adacore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.eu.adacore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id graeG_viokjX; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:22:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from polaris.localnet (bon31-6-88-161-99-133.fbx.proxad.net [88.161.99.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eu.adacore.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D8A3D27B31DD; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:22:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Eric Botcazou To: Richard Biener Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka Subject: Re: Add VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR to operand_equal_p Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 11:22:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3458949.DT0JXMSzxl@polaris> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.9 (Linux/3.16.7-24-desktop; KDE/4.14.9; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20151014162944.GE16672@kam.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg01467.txt.bz2 > Eric, does that look ok WRT TYPE_ALIGN_OK? (that is, did we decide > TYPE_ALIGN_OK is no longer needed?) I'm not sure we need to care about TYPE_ALIGN_OK here so no objection by me. -- Eric Botcazou