From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-patches-return-397678-listarch-gcc-patches=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 24382 invoked by alias); 12 May 2015 16:09:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-patches.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-patches-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-patches-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 24372 invoked by uid 89); 12 May 2015 16:09:15 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPAM_SUBJECT,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mail-wi0-f170.google.com
Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f170.google.com) (209.85.212.170) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 12 May 2015 16:09:14 +0000
Received: by wief7 with SMTP id f7so116039903wie.0        for <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 May 2015 09:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.180.88.72 with SMTP id be8mr99387wib.42.1431446951564;        Tue, 12 May 2015 09:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from android-4c5a376a18c0e957.fritz.box (p4FE9D2E8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.233.210.232])        by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pj5sm22994409wjb.40.2015.05.12.09.09.09        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);        Tue, 12 May 2015 09:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqO6fCRG6wCLzJet+c_2gA=V5y_YPVpCbzY-qLdPTQuDQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1505121536470.18702@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAMe9rOrHbbprYzpFCvUDcf9cWfCMg3C=VC0LCznSYu8K28DARQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1505121552480.18702@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAMe9rOrbA-2pH3GriTBdyfhBqTcsMssbZLHxZeCMpNuMmh8cyQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.11.1505121601170.18702@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <CAMe9rOqqLBT4JqDXm0v_mO7MQErGwrZ3f16s9kuadrOD7UB_dg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LSU.2.20.1505121723530.4883@wotan.suse.de> <CAMe9rOqO6fCRG6wCLzJet+c_2gA=V5y_YPVpCbzY-qLdPTQuDQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: My patch for GCC 5 directory names
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 16:11:00 -0000
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>,Michael Matz <matz@suse.de>
CC: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <34590F66-7C07-4ED1-B74B-A751224E851F@gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01116.txt.bz2

On May 12, 2015 5:58:07 PM GMT+02:00, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 8:28 AM, Michael Matz <matz@suse.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 12 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>>> >> So we have
>>> >>
>>> >> experimental
>>> >> release
>>> >> post-release
>>> >>
>>> >> Why not just rename prerelease to post-release? That is a
>one-line
>>> >> change.
>>> >
>>> > Why print anything at all?  5.1.1 is after 5.1.0 in obvious ways.
>>> >
>>>
>>> How can you tell GCC 5.1.1 on May 1, 2015 from GCC 5.1.1
>>> on May 12, 2015?
>>
>> Via the svn revision.  But as the subject says, this patch is not so
>much
>
>So? Doesn't post-release display the svn revision.for gcc -v, which
>gcc -v doesn't display today? Something like this
>
>diff --git a/gcc/DEV-PHASE b/gcc/DEV-PHASE
>index e69de29..ee176f8 100644
>--- a/gcc/DEV-PHASE
>+++ b/gcc/DEV-PHASE
>@@ -0,0 +1 @@
>+post-release

Printing post-release doesn't add any information.  I believe Jakub fixed the missing svn revision printing already.

Richard.

>
>> about the --version output (though it changes it in IMO sensible
>way), but
>> rather about file and directory names, so that they are based only on
>the
>> major version, not on the micro version (where major before gcc5 was
>X.Y,
>> and now is only X).
>>
>>
>> Ciao,
>> Michael.